Literature DB >> 20117556

Use of antithrombotic agents among U.S. stroke survivors, 2000-2006.

Eric M Cheng1, Stanley N Cohen, Martin L Lee, Stefanie D Vassar, Alex Y Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary stroke prevention guidelines recommend antithrombotic agents such as over-the-counter aspirin, prescription antiplatelet agents, or anticoagulant agents.
PURPOSE: The study was designed to measure whether use of outpatient antithrombotic agents is increasing among stroke survivors.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 4168 people who self-reported cerebrovascular disease and who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, an annual representative sample of the U.S., during the years 2000-2006. Use of antithrombotic agents was calculated from face-to-face interviews about the use of aspirin and from pharmacies about the use of prescription medications. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to detect temporal trends and multivariate models to identify predictors of use of antithrombotic agents.
RESULTS: Pooling results across the 7 years, it was found that 57% were taking aspirin, 66% were using any antiplatelet agent, and 75% were using any antithrombotic agent. After excluding people who said aspirin was unsafe, 81% were using any antithrombotic agent. During the study period, use of prescription antiplatelet agents increased (p<0.001) but there was no temporal change in use of antithrombotic agents overall. In multivariate models, being aged >65 years, male gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, having a usual source of care, and poor or fair health status were associated with use of an antithrombotic agent (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a high percentage of stroke survivors appear to use an antithrombotic agent, further research should investigate whether and how to improve care among the remaining 20% of stroke survivors, particularly among younger, female, and Hispanic patients. 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117556      PMCID: PMC2818982          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  31 in total

Review 1.  Design strategies and innovations in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure.

Authors:  Yuji Okura; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke.

Authors:  G W Albers; J D Easton; R L Sacco; P Teal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Antithrombotic agents in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J A Cairns; P Théroux; H D Lewis; M Ezekowitz; T W Meade; G C Sutton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Evidence for age and sex differences in the secondary prevention of stroke in Scottish primary care.

Authors:  C R Simpson; C Wilson; P C Hannaford; D Williams
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Aspirin use among adults with diabetes: estimates from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  D B Rolka; A Fagot-Campagna; K M Narayan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Preventing ischemic stroke in patients with prior stroke and transient ischemic attack : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  P A Wolf; G P Clagett; J D Easton; L B Goldstein; P B Gorelick; M Kelly-Hayes; R L Sacco; J P Whisnant
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Aspirin use among adults aged 40 and older in the United States: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; George K Anderson; Katherine Binns; Hugh H Tilson; Steven M Weisman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Patterns of aspirin use in middle-aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  E Shahar; A R Folsom; F J Romm; K M Bisgard; P A Metcalf; L Crum; P G McGovern; R G Hutchinson; G Heiss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  4 in total

1.  Confirmation of reported aspirin use in community studies: utility of serum thromboxane B2 measurement.

Authors:  Nicole Dodge Zantek; Russell V Luepker; Sue Duval; Karen Miller; Niki Oldenburg; Alan T Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku; Malcolm P Cutchin; Kendra Heatwole-Shank; Lloyd J Edwards
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Hantavirus Induced Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Sheema Mir
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-18

4.  Racial disparities in neurologic health care access and utilization in the United States.

Authors:  Altaf Saadi; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Nicte I Mejia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 9.910

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.