Literature DB >> 20117225

Troubleshooting methods for toxicity testing of airborne chemicals in vitro.

Shahnaz Bakand1, Amanda Hayes.   

Abstract

Toxicology studies of adverse effects induced by inhaled chemicals are technically challenging, due to the requirement of highly controlled experimental conditions needed to achieve reproducible and comparable results. Therefore, many considerations must be fulfilled before adopting in vitro bioassay test systems for toxicity screening of airborne materials. However, recent methodological and technical breakthroughs of in vitro methods have the potential to fulfil the essential requirements of toxicity testing for airborne chemicals. Technology has now become available that allows cells to be cultured on permeable microporous membranes in transwell or snapwell inserts providing a very close contact between target cells and test atmospheres to study the cellular interactions caused by airborne chemical exposures without any interfering culture medium. Using a direct exposure technique at the air-liquid interface, target cells can be continuously exposed to airborne chemicals on their apical side, while being nourished from their basolateral side. Test atmospheres with different physicochemical characteristics such as gases, vapours, solid and liquid aerosols and more recently nanoaerosols, can be delivered into human target cells using static and/or direct dynamic exposure methods. Therefore, toxicological risk assessments of airborne chemicals and even complex atmospheres can be achieved using in vitro test methods in parallel with real-time air monitoring techniques to fulfil the general regulatory requirements of newly developed chemical or pharmaceutical products with the potential for inhalational exposure. In this review current toxicological methods for toxicity testing of inhaled chemicals are presented. Further, to demonstrate the potential application of in vitro methods for studying inhalation toxicity, more advanced exposure techniques developed for toxicity screening of airborne chemicals are discussed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117225     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Air Quality Health Index for Predicting the Mutagenicity of Simulated Atmospheres.

Authors:  Jose Zavala; Jonathan D Krug; Sarah H Warren; Q Todd Krantz; Charly King; John McKee; Stephen H Gavett; Michael Lewandowski; William A Lonneman; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Matthew J Meier; Mark Higuchi; M Ian Gilmour; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Regulating temperature and relative humidity in air-liquid interface in vitro systems eliminates cytotoxicity resulting from control air exposures.

Authors:  Jose Zavala; Rebecca Greenan; Q Todd Krantz; David M DeMarini; Mark Higuchi; M Ian Gilmour; Paul A White
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Permeation of Therapeutic Drugs in Different Formulations across the Airway Epithelium In Vitro.

Authors:  Claudia Meindl; Sandra Stranzinger; Neira Dzidic; Sharareh Salar-Behzadi; Stefan Mohr; Andreas Zimmer; Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pulmonary phthalate exposure and asthma - is PPAR a plausible mechanistic link?

Authors:  Anette Kocbach Bølling; Jørn A Holme; Carl Gustaf Bornehag; Unni C Nygaard; Randi J Bertelsen; Eewa Nånberg; Johanna Bodin; Amrit Kaur Sakhi; Cathrine Thomsen; Rune Becher
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Air-liquid interface exposure to aerosols of poorly soluble nanomaterials induces different biological activation levels compared to exposure to suspensions.

Authors:  Thomas Loret; Emmanuel Peyret; Marielle Dubreuil; Olivier Aguerre-Chariol; Christophe Bressot; Olivier le Bihan; Tanguy Amodeo; Bénédicte Trouiller; Anne Braun; Christophe Egles; Ghislaine Lacroix
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Impact of Mycotoxins Secreted by Aspergillus Molds on the Inflammatory Response of Human Corneal Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Yélian Marc Bossou; Youssra Serssar; Amel Allou; Sandrine Vitry; Isabelle Momas; Nathalie Seta; Jean Menotti; Sophie Achard
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition within the Vitrocell® exposure module using quartz crystal microbalances.

Authors:  Jason Adamson; David Thorne; Annette Dalrymple; Debbie Dillon; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Quantification of cigarette smoke particle deposition in vitro using a triplicate quartz crystal microbalance exposure chamber.

Authors:  Jason Adamson; David Thorne; John McAughey; Deborah Dillon; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Validation of the dynamic direct exposure method for toxicity testing of diesel exhaust in vitro.

Authors:  Lucky Joeng; Amanda Hayes; Shahnaz Bakand
Journal:  ISRN Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-05

Review 10.  Toxicological Considerations, Toxicity Assessment, and Risk Management of Inhaled Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shahnaz Bakand; Amanda Hayes
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.