Literature DB >> 20117188

The effect of repeated testing on judgement biases in sheep.

Rebecca E Doyle1, Stephanie Vidal, Geoff N Hinch, Andrew D Fisher, Alain Boissy, Caroline Lee.   

Abstract

Testing judgement biases of animals may provide insight into their affective states; however important questions about methodologies need to be answered. This experiment investigated the effect of repeated testing using unreinforced, ambiguous cues on the response of sheep to a go/no-go judgement bias test. Fifteen sheep were trained to differentiate between two locations, reinforced respectively with feed (positive) or with the presentation of a dog (negative). The responses to nine ambiguous locations, positioned between the positively and negatively reinforced locations, were tested repeatedly over 3 weeks. Sheep exhibited a symmetrical gradation in response to ambiguous locations between the positive and negative reinforcers. There was a significant decline (P=0.001) in the total number of approaches to the ambiguous positions over time (weeks). This effect of time suggests that sheep learnt that the ambiguous locations were unrewarded. This result supplies evidence of a limitation identified in current judgement bias methodology, due to repeated testing, which has the potential to provide misleading results. Crown Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117188     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  30 in total

1.  Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (Corvus corax).

Authors:  Jessie E C Adriaense; Jordan S Martin; Martina Schiestl; Claus Lamm; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.

Authors:  Ľubor Košťál; Zuzana Skalná; Katarína Pichová
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Pair-bonding influences affective state in a monogamous fish species.

Authors:  Chloé Laubu; Philippe Louâpre; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Judgment Bias During Gestation in Domestic Pigs.

Authors:  Emily V Bushby; Sheena C Cotter; Anna Wilkinson; Mary Friel; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Dogs with separation-related problems show a "less pessimistic" cognitive bias during treatment with fluoxetine (Reconcile™) and a behaviour modification plan.

Authors:  Christos I Karagiannis; Oliver Hp Burman; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Does Trapping Influence Decision-Making under Ambiguity in White-Lipped Peccary (Tayassu pecari)?

Authors:  Selene Siqueira da Cunha Nogueira; Iurianny Karla Fernandes; Thaise Silva Oliveira Costa; Sérgio Luiz Gama Nogueira-Filho; Michael Mendl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of age on discrimination learning, reversal learning, and cognitive bias in family dogs.

Authors:  Patrizia Piotti; Dóra Szabó; Zsófia Bognár; Anna Egerer; Petrouchka Hulsbosch; Rachel Sophia Carson; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Development of a cognitive bias methodology for measuring low mood in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Long-term changes in cognitive bias and coping response as a result of chronic unpredictable stress during adolescence.

Authors:  Lauren E Chaby; Sonia A Cavigelli; Amanda White; Kayllie Wang; Victoria A Braithwaite
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Exclusion performance in dwarf goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) and sheep (Ovis orientalis aries).

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; Eberhard von Borell; Jan Langbein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.