OBJECTIVE: Selection of an appropriate diet for rodent spaceflight experiments is critical and may have significant effects on mission results. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) rodent food bar (RFB) was reformulated and designated as the nutrient-upgraded RFB (NuRFB). The objectives of this study were to determine whether the NuRFB nutrient formulation meets the 1995 National Research Council (NRC) nutrient recommendations and whether the NuRFB can be used for short-term (45-d) and long-term (90-d) spaceflight experiments. METHODS: Nutrient and moisture analyses of the NuRFB were performed. Young (age 13-14 wk) male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=16/group) were individually caged and fed a diet treatment consisting of 1) NuRFB, 2) RFB, or 3) modified AIN-93G containing 4% instead of the 7% fat for 45- or 90-d. At the end of the study, organs were weighted, and serum clinical chemistry indicators of organ function and hematologic measurements were determined. RESULTS: Chemical analysis of the diet ingredients showed that the NuRFB met the 1995 NRC nutrient recommendations for rats. Subsequent animal feeding studies showed that NuRFB was comparable to RFB and modified AIN-93G for supporting rat growth and body weight maintenance. In addition, the safety of the NuRFB for use as a spaceflight diet was indicated by the absence of changes in organ weight or function. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, the NuRFB performed similarly to the RFB and met the criteria necessary for short-term and long-term rodent spaceflight experiments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Selection of an appropriate diet for rodent spaceflight experiments is critical and may have significant effects on mission results. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) rodent food bar (RFB) was reformulated and designated as the nutrient-upgraded RFB (NuRFB). The objectives of this study were to determine whether the NuRFB nutrient formulation meets the 1995 National Research Council (NRC) nutrient recommendations and whether the NuRFB can be used for short-term (45-d) and long-term (90-d) spaceflight experiments. METHODS: Nutrient and moisture analyses of the NuRFB were performed. Young (age 13-14 wk) male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=16/group) were individually caged and fed a diet treatment consisting of 1) NuRFB, 2) RFB, or 3) modified AIN-93G containing 4% instead of the 7% fat for 45- or 90-d. At the end of the study, organs were weighted, and serum clinical chemistry indicators of organ function and hematologic measurements were determined. RESULTS: Chemical analysis of the diet ingredients showed that the NuRFB met the 1995 NRC nutrient recommendations for rats. Subsequent animal feeding studies showed that NuRFB was comparable to RFB and modified AIN-93G for supporting rat growth and body weight maintenance. In addition, the safety of the NuRFB for use as a spaceflight diet was indicated by the absence of changes in organ weight or function. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, the NuRFB performed similarly to the RFB and met the criteria necessary for short-term and long-term rodent spaceflight experiments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Bradley J Behnke; John N Stabley; Danielle J McCullough; Robert T Davis; James M Dominguez; Judy M Muller-Delp; Michael D Delp Journal: FASEB J Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Curtis R Taylor; Mina Hanna; Bradley J Behnke; John N Stabley; Danielle J McCullough; Robert T Davis; Payal Ghosh; Anthony Papadopoulos; Judy M Muller-Delp; Michael D Delp Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M Sung; J Li; A J Spieker; J Spatz; R Ellman; V L Ferguson; T A Bateman; G D Rosen; M Bouxsein; S B Rutkove Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Sarah E Latchney; Phillip D Rivera; Xiao W Mao; Virginia L Ferguson; Ted A Bateman; Louis S Stodieck; Gregory A Nelson; Amelia J Eisch Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-04-17
Authors: Paul Childress; Alexander Brinker; Cynthia-May S Gong; Jonathan Harris; David J Olivos; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Sungshin Y Choi; Yasaman Shirazi-Fard; Todd O McKinley; Tien-Min G Chu; Carolynn L Conley; Nabarun Chakraborty; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena Journal: Life Sci Space Res (Amst) Date: 2017-11-11
Authors: Lauren E Ritchie; Stella S Taddeo; Brad R Weeks; Florence Lima; Susan A Bloomfield; M Andrea Azcarate-Peril; Sara R Zwart; Scott M Smith; Nancy D Turner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Afshin Beheshti; Kaushik Chakravarty; Homer Fogle; Hossein Fazelinia; Willian A da Silveira; Valery Boyko; San-Huei Lai Polo; Amanda M Saravia-Butler; Gary Hardiman; Deanne Taylor; Jonathan M Galazka; Sylvain V Costes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Karen R Jonscher; Alba Alfonso-Garcia; Jeffrey L Suhalim; David J Orlicky; Eric O Potma; Virginia L Ferguson; Mary L Bouxsein; Ted A Bateman; Louis S Stodieck; Moshe Levi; Jacob E Friedman; Daila S Gridley; Michael J Pecaut Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric L Moyer; Paula M Dumars; Gwo-Shing Sun; Kara J Martin; David G Heathcote; Richard D Boyle; Mike G Skidmore Journal: NPJ Microgravity Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 4.415