Literature DB >> 20114134

Outcomes following appeal and reversal of civil commitment.

Jay H Moss1, Donald A Redelmeier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric inpatients may be detained against their will, yet they still retain the right to apply for a hearing to challenge this detention. We tested whether adjudicated decisions over whether to uphold or rescind the detention have implications in subsequent patient morbidity.
METHODS: Consecutive patients applying to the Consent and Capacity Board in Ontario between January 1, 2004, and March 31, 2007, were identified who had a hearing to challenge their involuntary detention. Population based databases provided information on subsequent deaths, hospitalization for a psychiatric illness, or emergency department visit for any reason.
RESULTS: A total of 3498 decisions were rendered for 2321 unique psychiatric patients during the 39 month study period. Almost all patients (90%) had a prior psychiatric admission. Approximately 18% of involuntary detentions were rescinded with subsequent outcomes showing a greater likelihood of emergency department visits within 100 days of discharge in the group whose detention was rescinded compared to the group whose detention was upheld (46% vs. 36%, P=.003).
CONCLUSIONS: When an involuntary detention is rescinded patients have a high likelihood of subsequent utilization of emergency department services for suicide related symptoms but no large increase in risk of dying. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20114134     DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  1 in total

1.  Involuntary detention: do psychiatrists clinically justify continuing involuntary hospitalization?

Authors:  Aqeel Hashmi; Mujeeb Shad; Howard M Rhoades; Ajay K Parsaik
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2014-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.