Floortje Mols1, Johan Denollet. 1. CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands. F.Mols@uvt.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews all available literature concerning the implications of Type D personality (the conjoint effects of negative affectivity and social inhibition) among patients with noncardiovascular conditions. METHODS: Published papers were included if they studied Type D personality among noncardiovascular patient populations. Twelve articles met our inclusion criteria and were subjected to a methodological quality checklist (e.g., sample size, response rate, Type D measurement). RESULTS: The methodological quality of the selected studies was quite good. The noncardiovascular patient populations included chronic pain, asthma, tinnitus, sleep apnea, primary care patients, vulvovaginal candidiasis, mild traumatic brain injury, vertigo, melanoma and diabetic foot syndrome. Type D personality was associated with an increased number or severity of reported health complaints, heightened the perception of negative emotions (e.g., depression and anxiety), had an adverse effect on health-related behaviors, was associated with poor adherence to treatment and significantly reduced effort to perform during diagnostic testing. CONCLUSION: Type D is a vulnerability factor that not only affects people with cardiovascular conditions but also those with other medical conditions. Type D was associated with poor physical and mental health status and poor self-management of the disease. Consequently, including Type D in future studies seems warranted. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews all available literature concerning the implications of Type D personality (the conjoint effects of negative affectivity and social inhibition) among patients with noncardiovascular conditions. METHODS: Published papers were included if they studied Type D personality among noncardiovascular patient populations. Twelve articles met our inclusion criteria and were subjected to a methodological quality checklist (e.g., sample size, response rate, Type D measurement). RESULTS: The methodological quality of the selected studies was quite good. The noncardiovascular patient populations included chronic pain, asthma, tinnitus, sleep apnea, primary care patients, vulvovaginal candidiasis, mild traumatic brain injury, vertigo, melanoma and diabetic foot syndrome. Type D personality was associated with an increased number or severity of reported health complaints, heightened the perception of negative emotions (e.g., depression and anxiety), had an adverse effect on health-related behaviors, was associated with poor adherence to treatment and significantly reduced effort to perform during diagnostic testing. CONCLUSION: Type D is a vulnerability factor that not only affects people with cardiovascular conditions but also those with other medical conditions. Type D was associated with poor physical and mental health status and poor self-management of the disease. Consequently, including Type D in future studies seems warranted. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Benjamin P Chapman; Kevin Fiscella; Ichiro Kawachi; Paul Duberstein; Peter Muennig Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Tatiana Dubayova; Martina Krokavcova; Iveta Nagyova; Jaroslav Rosenberger; Zuzana Gdovinova; Berrie Middel; Johan W Groothoff; Jitse P van Dijk Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: M Dieltjens; O M Vanderveken; D Van den Bosch; K Wouters; J Denollet; J A Verbraecken; P H Van de Heyning; M J Braem Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.816