OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the extent to which publicly funded behavioral health and primary care providers in Texas have integrated physical and mental health care, the strategies used in implementation efforts and barriers encountered in integration. METHOD: A survey of behavioral health and primary care providers in Texas was conducted to examine providers' perceptions of efforts to integrate physical and mental health care in their organizations. Integration strategies utilized, health conditions targeted and barriers to implementation were evaluated. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine organizations' current integration strategies and perceived clinical, organizational and financial barriers to integration. RESULTS: Out of 382 surveys initially distributed, a final subsample of 84 organizations with complete data was examined, a response rate of 22%. Among this sample of behavioral health and primary care providers, many shared integration practice strategies and endorsed similar barriers to integration. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that publicly funded organizations in Texas attempting to integrate physical and mental health care were aware of and employing practice strategies considered essential to the successful treatment of mental health issues in primary care settings. Attention to barriers that still exist, especially regarding workforce and funding issues, will be critical for organizations considering and attempting integration. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the extent to which publicly funded behavioral health and primary care providers in Texas have integrated physical and mental health care, the strategies used in implementation efforts and barriers encountered in integration. METHOD: A survey of behavioral health and primary care providers in Texas was conducted to examine providers' perceptions of efforts to integrate physical and mental health care in their organizations. Integration strategies utilized, health conditions targeted and barriers to implementation were evaluated. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine organizations' current integration strategies and perceived clinical, organizational and financial barriers to integration. RESULTS: Out of 382 surveys initially distributed, a final subsample of 84 organizations with complete data was examined, a response rate of 22%. Among this sample of behavioral health and primary care providers, many shared integration practice strategies and endorsed similar barriers to integration. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that publicly funded organizations in Texas attempting to integrate physical and mental health care were aware of and employing practice strategies considered essential to the successful treatment of mental health issues in primary care settings. Attention to barriers that still exist, especially regarding workforce and funding issues, will be critical for organizations considering and attempting integration. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jenifer L Vohs; Molin Shi; Emily G Holmes; Melissa Butler; Sarah A Landsberger; Sujuan Gao; Fanqian Ouyang; Evgenia Teal; Kristen Merkitch; William Kronenberger Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2022-05-11
Authors: Eric P Slade; Stanley Rosenberg; Lisa B Dixon; Richard W Goldberg; George L Wolford; Seth Himelhoch; Stephanie Tapscott Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Neda Laiteerapong; Erin M Staab; Wen Wan; Michael T Quinn; Amanda Campbell; Stacey Gedeon; Cindy T Schaefer; Deborah L Burnet; Marshall H Chin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Dennis P Watson; Erin L Adams; Sarah Shue; Heather Coates; Alan McGuire; Jeremy Chesher; Joanna Jackson; Ogbonnaya I Omenka Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.655