OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the methods for recruitment in a clinical trial on chiropractic care for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study investigated the efficacy of different amounts of total treatment dosage over 6 weeks in 60 volunteer subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects were recruited for this study through several media venues, focusing on successful and cost-effective strategies. Included in our efforts were radio advertising, newspaper advertising, direct mail, and various other low-cost initiatives. RESULTS: Of the 1211 telephone screens, 60 responders (5.0%) were randomized into the study. The most successful recruitment method was radio advertising, generating more than 64% of the calls (776 subjects). Newspaper and magazine advertising generated approximately 9% of all calls (108 subjects), and direct mail generated less than 7% (79 subjects). The total direct cost for recruitment was $40 740 or $679 per randomized patient. The costs per randomization were highest for direct mail ($995 per randomization) and lowest for newspaper/magazine advertising ($558 per randomization). CONCLUSIONS: Success of recruitment methods may vary based on target population and location. Planning of recruitment efforts is essential to the success of any clinical trial. Copyright 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the methods for recruitment in a clinical trial on chiropractic care for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study investigated the efficacy of different amounts of total treatment dosage over 6 weeks in 60 volunteer subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects were recruited for this study through several media venues, focusing on successful and cost-effective strategies. Included in our efforts were radio advertising, newspaper advertising, direct mail, and various other low-cost initiatives. RESULTS: Of the 1211 telephone screens, 60 responders (5.0%) were randomized into the study. The most successful recruitment method was radio advertising, generating more than 64% of the calls (776 subjects). Newspaper and magazine advertising generated approximately 9% of all calls (108 subjects), and direct mail generated less than 7% (79 subjects). The total direct cost for recruitment was $40 740 or $679 per randomized patient. The costs per randomization were highest for direct mail ($995 per randomization) and lowest for newspaper/magazine advertising ($558 per randomization). CONCLUSIONS: Success of recruitment methods may vary based on target population and location. Planning of recruitment efforts is essential to the success of any clinical trial. Copyright 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Ukamaka M Oruche; Janis E Gerkensmeyer; Joan K Austin; Susan M Perkins; Eric Scott; Laura M Lindsey; Kristen Mullins Journal: Clin Nurse Spec Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.067
Authors: Adrian Hapca; Claudine G Jennings; Li Wei; Adam Wilson; Thomas M MacDonald; Isla S Mackenzie Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Gregory D Cramer; Jerrilyn Cambron; Joe A Cantu; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Judith D Pocius; Douglas Gregerson; Michael Fergus; Ray McKinnis; Thomas J Grieve Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Joshua W Little; Thomas Grieve; Joseph Cantu; William C Bogar; Rudy Heiser; Heather Miley; Gregory D Cramer Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Stacie A Salsbury; Elissa Twist; Robert B Wallace; Robert D Vining; Christine M Goertz; Cynthia R Long Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-01-14
Authors: Kelli L Ahmed; Andrea R Simon; Jack R Dempsey; Rodney C Samaco; Robin P Goin-Kochel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 5.428