PURPOSE: Behavioral problems occur more frequently among adolescents in deprived areas, but most evidence concerns urbanized areas. Our aim was to assess the impact of area deprivation and urbanization on the occurrence and development of behavioral problems among adolescents in a mixed urban and rural area and to examine the contributory factors. METHODS: We obtained data from the first two waves (n=2,230; mean ages, 11.5 and 13.5 years respectively; response at follow-up, 96.4%) of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). TRAILS is a prospective study of adolescent mental health in a mixed urban and rural region of the Netherlands. We assessed adolescent behavioral problems using the parent-reported Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the adolescent-reported Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). Living areas were categorized into tertiles of deprivation. We further collected data on child temperament, perceived rearing style, parental socioeconomic position (education, income and occupation), family composition, and parental mental health history. RESULTS: At baseline, adolescents living in the most deprived tertile more frequently had elevated behavioral problem scores than those from the least deprived tertile on the CBCL (11.2% against 7.1%), YSR (11.9% against 6.9%), and ASB (11.5% against 7.4%) (all p < .05). Socioeconomic position explained half of the differences due to area deprivation. Other familial and parental characteristics did not significantly contribute to the explanation of observed area differences. CONCLUSIONS: As in highly urbanized areas, behavioral problems occur more frequently among adolescents in deprived mixed rural and urban areas. Urbanization has little effect on these area differences. Copyright 2010 Society for Adolescent Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: Behavioral problems occur more frequently among adolescents in deprived areas, but most evidence concerns urbanized areas. Our aim was to assess the impact of area deprivation and urbanization on the occurrence and development of behavioral problems among adolescents in a mixed urban and rural area and to examine the contributory factors. METHODS: We obtained data from the first two waves (n=2,230; mean ages, 11.5 and 13.5 years respectively; response at follow-up, 96.4%) of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). TRAILS is a prospective study of adolescent mental health in a mixed urban and rural region of the Netherlands. We assessed adolescent behavioral problems using the parent-reported Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the adolescent-reported Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Antisocial Behavior Scale (ABS). Living areas were categorized into tertiles of deprivation. We further collected data on child temperament, perceived rearing style, parental socioeconomic position (education, income and occupation), family composition, and parental mental health history. RESULTS: At baseline, adolescents living in the most deprived tertile more frequently had elevated behavioral problem scores than those from the least deprived tertile on the CBCL (11.2% against 7.1%), YSR (11.9% against 6.9%), and ASB (11.5% against 7.4%) (all p < .05). Socioeconomic position explained half of the differences due to area deprivation. Other familial and parental characteristics did not significantly contribute to the explanation of observed area differences. CONCLUSIONS: As in highly urbanized areas, behavioral problems occur more frequently among adolescents in deprived mixed rural and urban areas. Urbanization has little effect on these area differences. Copyright 2010 Society for Adolescent Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Candice L Odgers; Avshalom Caspi; Michael A Russell; Robert J Sampson; Louise Arseneault; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2012-08
Authors: Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Frank Baarveld; Danielle E M C Jansen; Jennie Ursum; Sijmen A Reijneveld; François G Schellevis Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Sijmen A Reijneveld; P Auke Wiegersma; Johan Ormel; Frank C Verhulst; Wilma A M Vollebergh; Danielle E M C Jansen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica Deighton; Peter Tymms; Panos Vostanis; Jay Belsky; Peter Fonagy; Anna Brown; Amelia Martin; Praveetha Patalay; Miranda Wolpert Journal: J Psychoeduc Assess Date: 2013-06