INTRODUCTION: Recently, a methacrylate-based obturation system, Resilon/RealSeal SE, has been developed to replace gutta-percha and traditional sealers. As a resin-based material, degree of conversion (DC) is one of the most important characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the time-dependent change of DC of RealSeal SE as well as the influence of canal moisture and root canal depth on it. METHODS: DC of RealSeal SE, either self-cured or dual-cured (n = 8 in each group), was calculated according to the Raman spectra obtained at different times after mixing. Thirty extracted teeth with single canal were instrumented and divided randomly into 2 groups in terms of different canal drying methods. In the ethanol group, excess distilled water in root canal was removed with paper points followed by 95% ethanol. In the paper points group, root canals were blot-dried with paper points until the last one appeared dry. DC of RealSeal SE was calculated from serial cross sections (2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex) obtained 1 week after obturation with Resilon/RealSeal SE. RESULTS: Significant increase in DC of RealSeal SE was observed in 1 week (P < .01), with little change afterwards (P > .05). DC of sealer in ethanol group was significantly higher than in paper points group (P < .01). However, DCs of RealSeal SE at different levels of tooth sections were not significantly different (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both self-cured and dual-cured RealSeal SE achieved stable DC after 1 week. Root canal moisture was a critical factor in determining DC of RealSeal SE. Copyright 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION: Recently, a methacrylate-based obturation system, Resilon/RealSeal SE, has been developed to replace gutta-percha and traditional sealers. As a resin-based material, degree of conversion (DC) is one of the most important characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the time-dependent change of DC of RealSeal SE as well as the influence of canal moisture and root canal depth on it. METHODS: DC of RealSeal SE, either self-cured or dual-cured (n = 8 in each group), was calculated according to the Raman spectra obtained at different times after mixing. Thirty extracted teeth with single canal were instrumented and divided randomly into 2 groups in terms of different canal drying methods. In the ethanol group, excess distilled water in root canal was removed with paper points followed by 95% ethanol. In the paper points group, root canals were blot-dried with paper points until the last one appeared dry. DC of RealSeal SE was calculated from serial cross sections (2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex) obtained 1 week after obturation with Resilon/RealSeal SE. RESULTS: Significant increase in DC of RealSeal SE was observed in 1 week (P < .01), with little change afterwards (P > .05). DC of sealer in ethanol group was significantly higher than in paper points group (P < .01). However, DCs of RealSeal SE at different levels of tooth sections were not significantly different (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both self-cured and dual-cured RealSeal SE achieved stable DC after 1 week. Root canal moisture was a critical factor in determining DC of RealSeal SE. Copyright 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.