Literature DB >> 20113793

Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplement to instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promoting intracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis.

Letícia C Souza1, Patrícia R R Brito, Julio C Machado de Oliveira, Flávio R F Alves, Edson J L Moreira, Hélio R Sampaio-Filho, Isabela N Rôças, José F Siqueira.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This in vitro study aimed to investigate the antibacterial effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with methylene blue (MB) or toluidine blue (TB) (both at 15 microg/mL) as a supplement to instrumentation/irrigation of root canals experimentally contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis.
METHODS: Seventy extracted teeth had their root canals contaminated with an endodontic strain of E. faecalis for 7 days, instrumented with nickel-titanium instruments and irrigated either with 2.5% NaOCl or with 0.85% NaCl, and then randomly distributed into four experimental groups: MB/NaOCl (PDT with MB and NaOCl as the irrigant), TB/NaOCl (PDT with TB and NaOCl as the irrigant), MB/NaCl (PDT with MB and NaCl as the irrigant), and TB/NaCl (PDT with TB and NaCl as the irrigant). For PDT, the photosensitizer remained in the canal for 2 minutes before exposed to red light emitted from a diode laser for 4 minutes. Samples were taken before and after instrumentation/irrigation and following the specific PDT procedure for each group, plated onto Mitis-salivarius agar and the colony forming units counted.
RESULTS: Regardless of the irrigant used (NaOCl or NaCl), instrumentation significantly reduced bacterial counts in comparison to the baseline (p < 0.001). NaOCl as the irrigant was significantly more effective than NaCl, and this difference persisted after PDT, irrespective of the photosensitizer used (p < 0.05). PDT with either MB or TB did not significantly enhance disinfection after chemomechanical preparation using NaOCl as irrigant (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two photosensitizers (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: These in vitro results suggest that PDT with either MB or TB may not exert a significant supplemental effect to instrumentation/irrigation procedures with regard to intracanal disinfection. Further adjustments in the PDT protocol may be required to enhance predictability in bacterial elimination before clinical use is recommended. Copyright 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20113793     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  29 in total

1.  Evolution of the role of phototherapy during endodontic decontamination.

Authors:  Omid Heidar Muhammad; Jean-Paul Rocca; Carlo Fornaini; Etienne Medioni
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2015-12-30

2.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against clinical isolates of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Mirian Marcolan De Mello; Patrícia Pimentel De Barros; Renata de Cassia Bernardes; Silvio Rubens Alves; Naiara Pires Ramanzini; Lívia Mara Alves Figueiredo-Godoi; Ana Carolina Chipoletti Prado; Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge; Juliana Campos Junqueira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Can Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) Enhance the Endodontic Treatment?

Authors:  Nasim Chiniforush; Maryam Pourhajibagher; Sima Shahabi; Emad Kosarieh; Abbas Bahador
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-27

Review 4.  The Use of Lasers in Disinfection and Cleanliness of Root Canals: a Review.

Authors:  Ivona Bago Jurič; Ivica Anić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-03

5.  Endodontic photodynamic therapy ex vivo.

Authors:  Raymond Ng; Fiza Singh; Despina A Papamanou; Xiaoqing Song; Chitrang Patel; Colleen Holewa; Niraj Patel; Vanja Klepac-Ceraj; Carla R Fontana; Ralph Kent; Tom C Pagonis; Philip P Stashenko; Nikolaos S Soukos
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Comparative antifungal efficacy of light-activated disinfection and octenidine hydrochloride with contemporary endodontic irrigants.

Authors:  Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz; Mehmet Burak Guneser; Makbule Bilge Akbulut
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Effects of photodynamic therapy, 2 % chlorhexidine, triantibiotic mixture, propolis and ozone on root canals experimentally infected with Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fabio Camacho-Alonso; P Salmerón-Lozano; Y Martínez-Beneyto
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Effect of fiber insertion depth on antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in rootcanals.

Authors:  Tina Rödig; Sarah Endres; Frank Konietschke; Ortrud Zimmermann; Hans Georg Sydow; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide and Photodynamic Therapy Against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans in Teeth With Periapical Lesions; An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Zohre Ahangari; Maryam Mojtahed Bidabadi; Mohammad Asnaashari; Afsaneh Rahmati; Fahimeh Sadat Tabatabaei
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-28

10.  Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of 810 nm Diode Laser and Photodynamic Therapy in Reducing the Microbial Flora of Root Canal in Endodontic Retreatment in Patients With Periradicular Lesions.

Authors:  Mohammad Asnaashari; Mostafa Godiny; Saranaz Azari-Marhabi; Fahimeh Sadat Tabatabaei; Maryam Barati
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.