Literature DB >> 20113753

Defining and describing capacity issues in US doctoral nursing research programs.

Ann F Minnick1, Linda D Norman, Beth Donaghey, Linda W Fisher, Irene M McKirgan.   

Abstract

The expansion of US doctoral research programs raises questions about mentorship capacity, program quality, and decisions about future expansion. To describe capacity issues and, when possible, compare findings to those of an earlier study, a survey of US nursing research doctoral programs (n = 105) was conducted in 2008. The response rate was 84.8%. The Web sites of non-responding schools were reviewed providing some data from all programs. The mean ratio of students per current externally funded grant was 6.9 (SD 7.5) to 1. The mean ratio of student to ever-funded faculty was 8.3 (SD 8.3) to 1. The mean number of research activities required (out of 5 possible) was 1.8 (SD 1.4), and the most common was a research practica (77%), followed by attendance at a research meeting external to the school (37%), and submitting an article for publication (32%). The quality of many programs may be compromised by capacity issues. Attention to existing programs' requirements and capacities and determination of the roles of these variables in producing research competitive graduates is needed. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20113753     DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Outlook        ISSN: 0029-6554            Impact factor:   3.250


  1 in total

1.  To what extent has doctoral (PhD) education supported academic nurse educators in their teaching roles: an integrative review.

Authors:  Carol Bullin
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-02-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.