Elisabeth Chéreau1, Marcos Ballester, Frédéric Selle, Annie Cortez, Emile Daraï, Roman Rouzier. 1. Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Prediction Unit (INSERM U953, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health), Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, and CancerEst, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare carcinomatosis scores, and to determine their relevance to predict resectability, morbidity, and outcome. STUDY DESIGN: From 2005-2008, 61 patients underwent surgery for ovarian cancer. We compared International Federation Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), peritoneal cancer index, Eisenkop, Aletti, Fagotti, and Fagotti-modified scores. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the different scores. In predicting resectability, Fagotti-modified and peritoneal cancer index outperformed other scores. We demonstrated a strong association between the occurrence of postoperative complications and Aletti, peritoneal cancer index, and Eisenkop scores (P < .0001). For progression-free survival, we observed significant differences among FIGO, peritoneal cancer index, Eisenkop, Fagotti-modified, and Aletti stages (P < .05). For stage III/IV patients, only Aletti score remains significant to predict resectability. This suggests that complete respectability is more related to the surgical effort than to the extent of the disease. CONCLUSION: Alternative ranking systems provide additional information over FIGO for complete resectability, complications, and survival. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare carcinomatosis scores, and to determine their relevance to predict resectability, morbidity, and outcome. STUDY DESIGN: From 2005-2008, 61 patients underwent surgery for ovarian cancer. We compared International Federation Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), peritoneal cancer index, Eisenkop, Aletti, Fagotti, and Fagotti-modified scores. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the different scores. In predicting resectability, Fagotti-modified and peritoneal cancer index outperformed other scores. We demonstrated a strong association between the occurrence of postoperative complications and Aletti, peritoneal cancer index, and Eisenkop scores (P < .0001). For progression-free survival, we observed significant differences among FIGO, peritoneal cancer index, Eisenkop, Fagotti-modified, and Aletti stages (P < .05). For stage III/IV patients, only Aletti score remains significant to predict resectability. This suggests that complete respectability is more related to the surgical effort than to the extent of the disease. CONCLUSION: Alternative ranking systems provide additional information over FIGO for complete resectability, complications, and survival. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Samar Masoumi Moghaddam; Afshin Amini; David L Morris; Mohammad H Pourgholami Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Antoni Llueca; Anna Serra; Maria Teresa Climent; Blanca Segarra; Yasmine Maazouzi; Marta Soriano; Javier Escrig Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 2.754