| Literature DB >> 20113501 |
Ferran Ballester1, Marisa Estarlich, Carmen Iñiguez, Sabrina Llop, Rosa Ramón, Ana Esplugues, Marina Lacasaña, Marisa Rebagliato.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal exposure to air pollution has been related to fetal growth in a number of recent scientific studies. The objective of this study was to assess the association between exposure to air pollution during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth in a cohort in Valencia, Spain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20113501 PMCID: PMC2845572 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Figure 1Spatial distribution of the NO.
Descriptive statistics of the estimates of individual exposure to ambient NO2 during the different pregnancy periods.
| Pregnancy period | Mean (μg/m3) | Percentiles (μg/m3) | Pearson's correlation (r) between periods | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 50 | 75 | First trimester | Second trimester | Third trimester | ||
| 37.9 | 28.2 | 38.1 | 48.5 | ||||
| 35.9 | 26.5 | 35.2 | 44.2 | 0.69* | |||
| 37.0 | 27.3 | 37.0 | 46.1 | 0.34* | 0.65* | ||
| 36.9 | 29.4 | 37.9 | 45.6 | 0.80* | 0.92* | 0.83* | |
*p < 0.001
INMA-Valencia cohort, 2003-2006
Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*
| Birth weight (in g)a | Birth length (in cm)a | Birth head circumference (in cm)a | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First trimester | -3.564 | (-23.698;16.570) | L | -0.092 | (-0.177;-0.008) | NL (4) | -0.069 | (-0.133;-0.004) | L | |||
| Second trimester | -4.464 | (-25.175;16.248) | NL (3) | -0.050 | (-0.137;0.037) | NL (2) | -0.071 | (-0.137;-0.004) | L | |||
| Third trimester | -5.740 | (-26.553;15.072) | L | -0.010 | (-0.096;0.077) | NL (4) | -0.017 | (-0.084;0.049) | L | |||
| Whole pregnancy | -5.792 | (-30.065;18.481) | NL (3) | -0.063 | (-0.165;0.038) | L | -0.074 | (-0.152;0.003) | L | |||
| First trimester | -12.782 | (-34.537;8.972) | NL (3) | -0.066 | (-0.149;0.017) | NL (4) | -0.066 | (-0.137;0.005) | L | |||
| Second trimester | -9.961 | (-32.594;12.671) | NL (4) | -0.040 | (-0.125;0.044) | NL (3) | -0.060 | (-0.133;0.014) | NL (3) | |||
| Third trimester | -4.294 | (-25.923;17.335) | L | -0.005 | (-0.089;0.079) | NL (2) | -0.028 | (-0.099;0.042) | L | |||
| Whole pregnancy | -9.729 | (-33.218;13.760) | L | -0.047 | (-0.146;0.052) | NL(2) | -0.058 | (-0.134;0.018) | NL (3) | |||
* Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures for a 10 μg/m3 increase in the mean NO2 levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.
a Standardized for gestational age.
b Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO2 in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).
c Adjusted for:
-Birth weight = maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.
-Birth length = maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the first trimester, country of origin, and sex of the infant.
-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.
Figure 2Relationship between individual NO. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). (A). Birth weight (gr) and NO2 exposure (3 df) B). Birth length (cm) and NO2 exposure (4 df). (C). Birth head circumference (cm) and NO2 exposure (4 df). Footnote for Figure 2(C): For birth head circumference the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.
Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 >40 μg/m3 in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*
| Birth weight (in g)a | Birth length (in cm)a | Birth head circumference (in cm)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First trimester | -24.309 | (-78.256; 29.638) | -0.300 | (-0.526; -0.075) | -0.104 | (-0.276; 0.069) |
| Second trimester | -9.648 | (-65.156; 45.860) | -0.100 | (-0.333; 0.133) | -0.173 | (-0.352; 0.005) |
| Third trimester | 28.325 | (-26.475; 83.126) | 0.150 | (-0.079; 0.379) | 0.051 | (-0.123; 0.226) |
| Whole pregnancy | -16.912 | (-71.233; 37.410) | -0.170 | (-0.398; 0.058) | -0.152 | (-0.326; 0.022) |
| First trimester | -40.349 | (-96.267; 15.568) | -0.271 | (-0.514; -0.028) | -0.074 | (-0.257; 0.108) |
| Second trimester | -37.546 | (-96.231; 21.140) | -0.190 | (-0.447; 0.066) | -0.177 | (-0.368; 0.014) |
| Third trimester | 26.656 | (-28.239; 81.551) | 0.077 | (-0.161; 0.315) | 0.011 | (-0.167; 0.190) |
| Whole pregnancy | -33.292 | (-84.874; 18.290) | -0.199 | (-0.424; 0.027) | -0.171 | (-0.339; -0.003) |
*Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures comparing NO2 exposure levels >40 μg/m3 vs. exposure levels ≤40 μg/m3 at each woman residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.
a Standardized for gestational age.
b Adjusted for:
-Birth weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.
-Birth length: maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal working status in the first trimester, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.
-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the third trimester, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.
Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 in different time periods during pregnancy and Small for Gestational Age (SGA).*
| SGA - weight | SGA - length | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First trimester | 1.013 | (0.992; 1.035) | L | 1.001 | (0.968; 1.035) | L |
| Second trimester | 1.013 | (0.992; 1.034) | L | 1.006 | (0.972; 1.041) | L |
| Third trimester | 1.004 | (0.983; 1.026) | L | 1.013 | (0.979; 1.049) | L |
| Whole pregnancy | 1.014 | (0.988; 1.040) | L | 1.010 | (0.970; 1.052) | L |
| First trimester | 1.182 | (0.894; 1.563) | L | 1.137 | (0.741; 1.744) | L |
| Second trimester | 1.369 | (1.013; 1.849) | L | 1.416 | (0.890; 2.254) | L |
| Third trimester | 1.186 | (0.906; 1.552) | L | 1.103 | (0.750; 1.623) | L |
| Whole pregnancy | 1.281 | (0.942; 1.743) | L | 1.230 | (0.778; 1.945) | L |
*Estimates are expressed as the change in odds for SGA (birth weight) and SGA (birth length) for a 10 μg/m3 increase in the mean NO2 levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.
a Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO2 in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).
b Adjusted for:
-SGA in weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, country of origin, smoking during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.
-SGA in length: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal education, parity, smoking during pregnancy, gestational weight gain, country of origin, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.
Figure 3Relationship between individual NO. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). A). Logit of small for gestational age in birth weight and NO2 exposure (2 df). Footnote for Figure 3(A): For SGA (in birth weight) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model. (B). Logit of small for gestational age in birth length and NO2 exposure (2 df). Footnote for Figure 3(B): For SGA (in birth length) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.