PURPOSE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because they slow disease progression. But physicians' concerns about the risk of hyperkalemia (elevated serum potassium level), a potentially fatal adverse effect, may limit optimal management with ACE-inhibitors. We synthesized known predictors of hyperkalemia into a prognostic risk score to predict the risk of hyperkalemia. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of adult patients with possible CKD (at least one estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) who started an ACE-inhibitor (i.e., incident users) between 1998 and 2006 at a health maintenance organization. We followed patients for hyperkalemia: (1) potassium value >5.5 mmol/L; or (2) diagnosis code for hyperkalemia. Cox regression synthesized a priori predictors recorded in the electronic medical record into a risk score. RESULTS: We followed 5171 patients and 145 experienced hyperkalemia, a 90-day risk of 2.8%. Predictors included: age, eGFR, diabetes, heart failure, potassium supplements, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a high dose for the ACE-inhibitor (lisinopril). The risk score separated high-risk patients (top quintile, observed risk of 6.9%) from low-risk patients (bottom quintile, observed risk of 0.7%). Predicted and observed risks agreed within 1% for each quintile. The risk increased gradually in relation to declining eGFR with no apparent threshold for contraindicating ACE-inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score separated high-risk patients (who may need more intensive laboratory monitoring) from low-risk patients. The risk score should be validated in other populations before it is ready for use in clinical practice.
PURPOSE:Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because they slow disease progression. But physicians' concerns about the risk of hyperkalemia (elevated serum potassium level), a potentially fatal adverse effect, may limit optimal management with ACE-inhibitors. We synthesized known predictors of hyperkalemia into a prognostic risk score to predict the risk of hyperkalemia. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of adult patients with possible CKD (at least one estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) who started an ACE-inhibitor (i.e., incident users) between 1998 and 2006 at a health maintenance organization. We followed patients for hyperkalemia: (1) potassium value >5.5 mmol/L; or (2) diagnosis code for hyperkalemia. Cox regression synthesized a priori predictors recorded in the electronic medical record into a risk score. RESULTS: We followed 5171 patients and 145 experienced hyperkalemia, a 90-day risk of 2.8%. Predictors included: age, eGFR, diabetes, heart failure, potassium supplements, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a high dose for the ACE-inhibitor (lisinopril). The risk score separated high-risk patients (top quintile, observed risk of 6.9%) from low-risk patients (bottom quintile, observed risk of 0.7%). Predicted and observed risks agreed within 1% for each quintile. The risk increased gradually in relation to declining eGFR with no apparent threshold for contraindicating ACE-inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score separated high-risk patients (who may need more intensive laboratory monitoring) from low-risk patients. The risk score should be validated in other populations before it is ready for use in clinical practice.
Authors: Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: David M Kent; Tazeen H Jafar; Rodney A Hayward; Hocine Tighiouart; Marcia Landa; Paul de Jong; Dick de Zeeuw; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Anne-Lise Kamper; Andrew S Levey Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Joy M Weinberg; Lawrence J Appel; George Bakris; Jennifer J Gassman; Tom Greene; Cynthia A Kendrick; Xuelei Wang; James Lash; Julia A Lewis; Velvie Pogue; Denyse Thornley-Brown; Robert A Phillips Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-09-28
Authors: Takeshi Morimoto; Tejal K Gandhi; Julie M Fiskio; Andrew C Seger; Joseph W So; E Francis Cook; Tsuguya Fukui; David W Bates Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Emmanuel Eschmann; Patrick E Beeler; Vladimir Kaplan; Markus Schneemann; Gregor Zünd; Jürg Blaser Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Esther V Uijtendaal; Jeannette E F Zwart-van Rijkom; Wouter W van Solinge; Toine C G Egberts Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-03-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ghassan Bandak; Yingying Sang; Alessandro Gasparini; Alex R Chang; Shoshana H Ballew; Marie Evans; Johan Arnlov; Lars H Lund; Lesley A Inker; Josef Coresh; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Morgan E Grams Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Michael H Chiu; Robert J H Miller; Rebecca Barry; Bing Li; Bryan J Har; Stephen B Wilton; Merril Knudtson; Jonathan G Howlett; Matthew T James Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2018-10-15