| Literature DB >> 20110895 |
Yuping Tang1, Min Zhu, Sheng Yu, Yongqing Hua, Jin-Ao Duan, Shulan Su, Xu Zhang, Yin Lu, Anwei Ding.
Abstract
Phthalides are important bio-active constituents in Si-Wu-Tang and Fo-Shou-San, two commonly used Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) combined prescriptions mainly derived from Radix Angelica and Rhizoma Chuanxiong. In this paper, the contents of eight phthalides, including Z-ligustilide, E-ligustilide, Z-butylenephthalide, E-butylene-phthalide, 3-butylphthalide, neocnidilide and senkyunolide A were determined or estimated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed GC-MS was a simple, rapid, and high sensitive method for analyzing phthalides in Si-Wu-Tang, Fo-Shou-San, Radix Angelica and Rhizoma Chuanxiong, and the extractable contents of each phthalides including Z-ligustilide, E-ligustilide, Z-butylenephthalide, etc. varied after Radix Angelica, Rhizoma Chuanxiong were combined into a formulation, such as Si-Wu-Tang and Fo-Shou-San. Furthermore, inhibition activity of essential oils from Si-Wu-Tang, Fo-Shou-San, Radix Angelica and Rhizoma Chuanxiong on uterine contraction was tested in an in vitro assay, and the results showed that the activity of the essential oil is higher as the content of the phthalides increase, which demonstrated that phthalides are possibly main active components inhibiting mice uterine contraction in vitro. All of the results suggested that comparative analysis of chemical components and pharmacological activities of each herb and formula is possibly helpful to elucidate the active components in traditional Chinese medicine, and to reveal the compatibility mechanism of TCM formulae.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20110895 PMCID: PMC6257054 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15010341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1GC-MS total ion chromatograms for essential oils from RA (1a), RL (1b), FSS (1c), and SWT (1d).
MS data of 12 compounds identified from SWT, FSS, RA and RL.
| Peak No. | Compound | Rt (min) | MS dataa |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4-Terpineol | 7.56 | 154 (M+, 20), 136 (12), 111 (60), 93 (53), 91 (20), 86 (24), 69 (25), 67 (23), 55 (30), 44 (30), 43 (54) |
|
| Spathulenol | 11.85 | 220 (M+, 26), 206 (22), 205 (100), 191 (8), 145 (9), 105 (11), 81 (10), 57 (16), 44 (33), 43 (17) |
|
| Benzeneethanamine | 12.93 | 205 (M+, 33), 159 (25), 149 (20), 133 (17), 131 (26), 119 (22), 105 (34), 91 (38), 44 (100), 43 (71) |
|
| 3-Butylphthalide | 13.93 | 190 (M+, 3), 134 (11), 133 (100), 105 (27), 77 (12), 76 (4), 51 (5), 44 (10), 43 (4) |
|
| 14.23 | 188 (M+, 19), 173 (2), 160 (12), 159 (100), 146 (31), 131 (23), 115 (7), 104 (15), 103 (22), 77 (19) | |
|
| Unknown phthalide | 14.32 | 192 (M+, 84), 163 (13), 159 (17), 150(29), 149 (43), 133 (19), 122 (20), 108 (100), 107 (59), 76 (62), 44 (81) |
|
| 1-Ethenyl-2-hexenyl cyclopropane | 14.55 | 150 (M+, 15), 107 (13), 94 (41), 93 (55), 91 (27), 80 (53), 79 (100), 77 (29), 44 (50), 43 (25), 41 (17) |
|
| Senkyunolide A | 14.93 | 192 (M+, 20), 163 (2), 133 (19), 108 (10), 107 (100), 105 (10), 85 (8), 79 (25), 77 (30) |
|
| 14.99 | 188 (M+, 19), 160 (16), 159 (100), 146 (40), 133 (15), 131 (24), 107 (17), 103 (31), 77 (25), 44 (49) | |
|
| Neocnidilide | 15.06 | 194 (M+, 2), 137 (4), 109 (14), 108 (100), 91 (3), 81 (8), 80 (20), 79 (31), 77 (9), 44 (10), 41 (6) |
|
| 15.18 | 190 (M+, 63), 161 (100), 148 (86), 147 (15), 134 (18), 120 (13), 115 (11), 106 (41), 77 (34), 55 (52) | |
|
| 16.27 | 190 (M+, 71), 161 (100), 159 (28), 148 (83), 147 (17), 133 (20), 106 (46), 105 (72), 77 (44), 55 (64) |
a m/z, relative intensity is shown in parenthesis, and ion of relative intensity 100 was used for the quantification.
Figure 2The structures of twelve compounds identified in essential oils from SWT, FSS, RA and RL.
Extractable content (mg) of eight phthalides based on mass spectra in SWT, FSS, RA and RL.
| Compounds | SWT | FSS | RA | RL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Butylphthalidea | 0.042 (0.8)b | 0.086 (1.3) | 0.007 (0.3) | 0.096 (2.6) |
| 0.116 (2.1) | 0.194 (3.0) | 0.030 (1.5) | 0.160 (4.4) | |
| Compound 6 | 0.022 (0.4) | 0.046 (0.7) | +c | 0.056 (1.5) |
| Senkyunolide A | 0.166 (3.1) | 0.278 (4.3) | 0.002 (0.1) | 0.444 (12.2) |
| 0.016 (0.3) | 0.032 (0.5) | 0.005 (0.2) | + | |
| Neocnidilide | 0.064 (1.2) | 0.082 (1.3) | + | 0.134 (3.7) |
| 2.974 (54.8) | 3.514 (54.6) | 1.077 (53.0) | 2.048 (56.3) | |
| 0.070 (1.3) | 0.100 (1.5) | 0.027 (1.3) | 0.048 (1.3) | |
| Total | 3.470 (63.9) | 4.332 (67.3) | 1.148 (56.5) | 2.986 (82.1) |
a 3-Butylphthalide, Z-butylenephthalide, compound 6, senkyunolide A, E-butylenephthalide, neocnidilide and E-ligustilide were determined using Z-ligustilide as reference; b The data was presented as average of three replicates (R.S.D.< 2.5%). Injection volume 1 μL with split ratio of 40:1. Their extractable contents (mg) are relative to SWT (4.0 g), FSS (2.0 g), RA (1.0 g), and RL (1.0 g), respectively. The amount in parenthesis are the relative percentage content (%) of each phthalide in the different essential oils; c Under the limit of quantitation.
The effects of the investigated essential oils on uterine contraction in vitro.
| Samples | Dosage(μg /mL) | Inhibiting ratio of frequency (%) | Inhibition ratio of contraction amplitude (%) | Inhibition ratio of muscle hypertonic (%) | ED50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| control | - | 8.78 ± 1.83 | 3.76 ± 0.52 | 13.25 ± 1.17 | - |
| SWT | 12.06 | 39.78 ± 1.64 | 13.10 ± 1.42 | 22.00 ± 2.33 | 12.34 |
| FSS | 12.55 | 51.67 ± 1.41 | 35.07 ± 2.56 | 48.10 ± 2.40 | 11.03 |
| RA | 12.87 | 27.18 ± 1.22 | 21.22 ± 1.12 | 20.21 ± 1.27 | 14.52 |
| RL | 6.82 | 24.98 ± 1.97 | 25.09 ± 1.92 | 23.45 ± 1.03 | 7.78 |
| 8.76 | 32.09 ± 3.08 | 32.28 ± 1.04 | 26.32 ± 1.28 | 5.60 |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10).
Figure 3The percentage content (%) of total phthalides in essential oil- effects on uterine contraction in vitro.