PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Leucine does not only serve as a substrate for protein synthesis but is also recognized as a potent signal nutrient that regulates protein metabolism. Accordingly, leucine supplementation has been suggested to develop muscle mass or prevent protein loss in several conditions characterized by muscle protein wasting. In the present review, we reported the recent results related to the effect of dietary leucine or leucine-rich amino acid mixture and proteins on whole body composition. RECENT FINDINGS: Although recent studies corroborate that increasing plasma leucine concentration generally induces an increase in muscle protein synthesis, long-term dietary leucine supplementation has been poorly investigated. Chronic free leucine supplementation alone did not improve lean body or muscle mass during resistance training or in elderly, whereas it was able to limit the weight loss induced by malnutrition. Contradictory data were also reported concerning the effect of leucine supplementation for weight management in obese patients. Leucine-rich amino acid mixture or proteins appeared more efficient than leucine alone to improve muscle mass and performance, suggesting the efficacy of leucine depends nevertheless on the presence of other amino acids. SUMMARY: Until now, there is no evidence that chronic leucine supplementation is efficient in promoting muscle mass or preventing protein loss during catabolic states. Further studies are required to determine the duration and nutritional conditions of long-term leucine supplementation and to establish whether such nutritional interventions can help to prevent or treat muscle loss in various pathological or physiological conditions.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Leucine does not only serve as a substrate for protein synthesis but is also recognized as a potent signal nutrient that regulates protein metabolism. Accordingly, leucine supplementation has been suggested to develop muscle mass or prevent protein loss in several conditions characterized by muscle protein wasting. In the present review, we reported the recent results related to the effect of dietary leucine or leucine-rich amino acid mixture and proteins on whole body composition. RECENT FINDINGS: Although recent studies corroborate that increasing plasma leucine concentration generally induces an increase in muscle protein synthesis, long-term dietary leucine supplementation has been poorly investigated. Chronic free leucine supplementation alone did not improve lean body or muscle mass during resistance training or in elderly, whereas it was able to limit the weight loss induced by malnutrition. Contradictory data were also reported concerning the effect of leucine supplementation for weight management in obesepatients. Leucine-rich amino acid mixture or proteins appeared more efficient than leucine alone to improve muscle mass and performance, suggesting the efficacy of leucine depends nevertheless on the presence of other amino acids. SUMMARY: Until now, there is no evidence that chronic leucine supplementation is efficient in promoting muscle mass or preventing protein loss during catabolic states. Further studies are required to determine the duration and nutritional conditions of long-term leucine supplementation and to establish whether such nutritional interventions can help to prevent or treat muscle loss in various pathological or physiological conditions.
Authors: Liam McAllan; Paul D Cotter; Helen M Roche; Riitta Korpela; Kanishka N Nilaweera Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: Sarah Everman; Christian Meyer; Lee Tran; Nyssa Hoffman; Chad C Carroll; William L Dedmon; Christos S Katsanos Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Rodrigo Manjarín; Daniel A Columbus; Agus Suryawan; Hanh V Nguyen; Adriana D Hernandez-García; Nguyet-Minh Hoang; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa Davis Journal: Amino Acids Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.520
Authors: Claire Boutry; Samer W El-Kadi; Agus Suryawan; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner; Barbara Stoll; Renán A Orellana; Hanh V Nguyen; Scot R Kimball; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa A Davis Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.310