Literature DB >> 20110429

PET positive, PET negative, or PET peeve?

Jonathan W Friedberg1.   

Abstract

Year:  2010        PMID： 20110429     DOI： 10.1182/blood-2009-09-244947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN： 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  qPET - a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma.

Authors:  Dirk Hasenclever; Lars Kurch; Christine Mauz-Körholz; Andreas Elsner; Thomas Georgi; Hamish Wallace; Judith Landman-Parker; Angelina Moryl-Bujakowska; Michaela Cepelová; Jonas Karlén; Ana Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro; Andishe Attarbaschi; Alexander Fosså; Jane Pears; Andrea Hraskova; Eva Bergsträsser; Auke Beishuizen; Anne Uyttebroeck; Eckhard Schomerus; Osama Sabri; Dieter Körholz; Regine Kluge
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  2-[18F]fludarabine, a novel positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for imaging lymphoma: a micro-PET study in murine models.

Authors:  Martine Dhilly; Stéphane Guillouet; Delphine Patin; Fabien Fillesoye; Ahmed Abbas; Fabienne Gourand; Olivier Tirel; Françoise Galateau; Eric T MacKenzie; Charles Dumontet; Michel Leporrier; Louisa Barré
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Quantitative assessment of interim PET in Hodgkin lymphoma: An evaluation of the qPET method in adult patients in the RAPID trial.

Authors:  Thomas W Georgi; Lars Kurch; Dirk Hasenclever; Victoria S Warbey; Lucy Pike; John Radford; Osama Sabri; Regine Kluge; Sally F Barrington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.