Literature DB >> 20110047

Clinically significant drug-drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: a Delphi survey of oncology pharmacists.

Alexandre Chan1, Seow-Hwei Tan, Chen May Wong, Kevin Yi-Lwern Yap, Yu Ko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to adverse clinical outcomes, particularly in oncology, because of the narrow therapeutic index of chemotherapeutic agents and because patients with cancer are at a high risk due to polypharmacy and age-related organ dysfunction. In a previously published study, drug profiles were developed based on primary and tertiary literature reviews for a list of clinically significant DDIs involving 28 oral anticancer agents (OAAs).
OBJECTIVE: This study was based on a Delphi survey of oncology pharmacists; the survey results were used to develop a consensus list of clinically significant DDIs involving OAAs and nonanticancer agents.
METHODS: In this study, the DDI profiles previously developed were updated, and the DDI pairs that were listed both in the 2009 Drug Interaction Facts (DIF) and the Thomson Micromedex DrugDex System compendia and that also met the predetermined criteria for clinical significance were selected for further evaluation. In a 2-round, electronically administered Delphi survey of oncology pharmacists, a 5-point Likert scale (1-5, where 1 = strongly agree and 5 = strongly disagree) was used to evaluate the DDI pairs based on 8 clinical aspects (clinical importance; irreversible morbidity and mortality; quality of data; quantity of data; patient's organ functions; comorbid conditions; awareness of interaction; and management burden). International pharmacists who specialized in oncology pharmacy practice and had > or =5 years of practice experience were eligible to participate.
RESULTS: Nine of the 23 surveyed pharmacists responded, giving a response rate of 39.1%. A total of 37 DDI pairs were selected from DIF and DrugDex and evaluated by the survey respondents, resulting in the identification, via consensus, of 12 clinically significant DDI pairs. The clinical aspects with the most DDIs that reached consensus of agreement were clinical importance (82.9%) and awareness of interaction (73.2%).
CONCLUSION: An expert panel identified 12 clinically significant DDIs involving OAAs. Copyright 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20110047     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  9 in total

Review 1.  The need for community pharmacists in oncology outpatient care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johannes Thoma; Romána Zelkó; Balázs Hankó
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-04-07

2.  Development of consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing in UK hospital practice.

Authors:  Antonella Tonna; Dorothy McCaig; Lesley Diack; Bernice West; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Potentially inappropriate medication use in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Meghan S Karuturi; Holly M Holmes; Xiudong Lei; Michael Johnson; Carlos H Barcenas; Scott B Cantor; Gary E Gallick; Robert C Bast; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Potential drug interactions and chemotoxicity in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mihaela A Popa; Kristie J Wallace; Antonella Brunello; Martine Extermann; Lodovico Balducci
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Metabolism-related pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: current understanding, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Yi Ling Teo; Han Kiat Ho; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Profound reduction in tamoxifen active metabolite endoxifen in a breast cancer patient treated with rifampin prior to initiation of an anti-TNFα biologic for ulcerative colitis: a case report.

Authors:  Sara L Henderson; Wendy A Teft; Richard B Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Validation of a transparent decision model to rate drug interactions.

Authors:  Elmira Far; Ivanka Curkovic; Kelly Byrne; Malgorzata Roos; Isabelle Egloff; Michael Dietrich; Wilhelm Kirch; Gerd-A Kullak-Ublick; Marco Egbring
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.483

8.  KRAS early testing: consensus initiative and cost-effectiveness evaluation for metastatic colorectal patients in an Italian setting.

Authors:  Carlo Barone; Carmine Pinto; Nicola Normanno; Lorenzo Capussotti; Francesco Cognetti; Alfredo Falcone; Lorenzo Mantovani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Michelle King; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.