Literature DB >> 20109998

A randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the antimicrobial effects of a cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse on dental plaque bacteria.

Deyu Hu1, Xue Li, Prem K Sreenivasan, William DeVizio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinses that range from 1 use to 6 months of use have documented the clinical efficacy of these formulations on supragingival plaque and gingivitis.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of a commercially available mouth rinse containing 0.05% CPC versus a fluoride mouth rinse on the anaerobic bacteria found in dental plaque. Antimicrobial effects on the organisms of the supragingival plaque, a natural biofilm, were determined after 1 use and after 14 days of use of each mouth rinse.
METHODS: After enrollment, adult subjects from China completed a 1-week washout period and provided baseline samples of supragingival plaque for analysis of anaerobic bacteria. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a commercially available mouth rinse formulated with 0.05% CPC or a fluoride mouth rinse. Subjects were assigned to each group according to a computer-generated randomization sequence. They were instructed to rinse with 20 mL of either the CPC or the fluoride mouth rinse for 30 seconds. Microbiologic analyses of dental plaque samples were conducted 12 hours after the first use of assigned mouth rinse. Subjects were instructed to continue twice-daily rinsing with their assigned mouth rinse for the next 14 days in addition to brushing their teeth with a commercial fluoride toothpaste. Dental plaque samples for microbiologic analyses were collected on day 15; this was done 12 hours after the final use of the assigned mouth rinses. A dentist conducted oral examinations before each sample collection to evaluate hard and soft tissue health over the course of the study.
RESULTS: The study included 117 adults (62 females, mean age, 28.70 years; 55 males, mean age, 30.41 years). Subjects rinsing with the CPC mouthwash (n = 58; mean age, 29.41 years) reported significant reductions in anaerobic bacteria versus those issued the fluoride rinse (n = 59; mean age, 29.61 years) 12 hours after 1 use and 12 hours after 14 days of use (P < 0.001). The mean percent reduction in anaerobic bacteria between the CPC mouth rinse and the fluoride mouth rinse was 29.98% after 1 use and 57.90% after 14 days of use. All enrolled subjects completed the study without any adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Use of the CPC mouth rinse was associated with significant reductions in the anaerobic bacteria of supragingival plaque compared with fluoride mouth rinse use in these adult subjects. Copyright 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20109998     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

1.  N-acetyl cysteine versus chlorhexidine mouthwashes in prevention and treatment of experimental gingivitis: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahlam Al-Kamel; Wadhah Abdulnaser Al-Hajj; Esam Halboub; Saleem Abdulrab; Khaled Al-Tahami; Nezar Noor Al-Hebshi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride.

Authors:  Joe Latimer; Jodie L Munday; Kara M Buzza; Sarah Forbes; Prem K Sreenivasan; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 3.  Adverse events associated with home use of mouthrinses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Chiarella Sforza; Conchita Martín
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Oral rinses in growth inhibition and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kashyap; Budhadev Baral; Tarun Prakash Verma; Charu Sonkar; Debi Chatterji; Ajay Kumar Jain; Hem C Jha
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Adherence to and acceptability of three alcohol-free, antiseptic oral rinses: A community-based pilot randomized controlled trial among pregnant women in rural Nepal.

Authors:  Daniel J Erchick; Nitin K Agrawal; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz; Steven C LeClerq; Mark A Reynolds; Luke C Mullany
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.383

6.  Salivary SARS-CoV-2 load reduction with mouthwash use: A randomized pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Fernanda de Paula Eduardo; Luciana Corrêa; Debora Heller; Carlo Amorin Daep; Carlos Benitez; Zilson Malheiros; Bernal Stewart; Maria Ryan; Clarisse Martins Machado; Nelson Hamerschlak; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Letícia Mello Bezinelli
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-18

Review 7.  Classic vs. Novel Antibacterial Approaches for Eradicating Dental Biofilm as Adjunct to Periodontal Debridement: An Evidence-Based Overview.

Authors:  Ali Abdulkareem; Hayder Abdulbaqi; Sarhang Gul; Mike Milward; Nibras Chasib; Raghad Alhashimi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.