Literature DB >> 20109460

Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.

C C Constantinoiu1, L A Jackson, W K Jorgensen, A E Lew-Tabor, E K Piper, D G Mayer, B Venus, N N Jonsson.   

Abstract

Bos taurus indicus cattle are less susceptible to infestation with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus than Bos taurus taurus cattle but the immunological basis of this difference is not understood. We compared the dynamics of leukocyte infiltrations (T cell subsets, B cells, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-expressing cells, granulocytes) in the skin near the mouthparts of larvae of R. microplus in B. t. indicus and B. t. taurus cattle. Previously naïve cattle were infested with 50,000 larvae (B. t. indicus) or 10,000 larvae (B. t. taurus) weekly for 6 weeks. One week after the last infestation all of the animals were infested with 20,000 larvae of R. microplus. Skin punch biopsies were taken from all animals on the day before the primary infestation and from sites of larval attachment on the day after the first, second, fourth and final infestations. Infiltrations with CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+) and gammadelta T cells followed the same pattern in both breeds, showing relatively little change during the first four weekly infestations, followed by substantial increases at 7 weeks post-primary infestation. There was a tendency for more of all cell types except granulocytes to be observed in the skin of B. t. indicus cattle but the differences between the two breeds were consistently significant only for gammadelta T cells. Granulocyte infiltrations increased more rapidly from the day after infestation and were higher in B. t. taurus cattle than in B. t. indicus. Granulocytes and MHC class II-expressing cells infiltrated the areas closest to the mouthparts of larvae. A large volume of granulocyte antigens was seen in the gut of attached, feeding larvae. (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20109460     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  17 in total

1.  The RIPK2 gene: a positional candidate for tick burden supported by genetic associations in cattle and immunological response of knockout mouse.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto Neto; Nicholas N Jonsson; Aaron Ingham; Rowan J Bunch; Blair E Harrison; William Barendse
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 2.  Changing distributions of ticks: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Elsa Léger; Gwenaël Vourc'h; Laurence Vial; Christine Chevillon; Karen D McCoy
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Blood transcriptome profile induced by an efficacious vaccine formulated with salivary antigens from cattle ticks.

Authors:  Sandra R Maruyama; Benilton Carvalho; Mar González-Porta; Johan Rung; Alvis Brazma; Luiz Gustavo Gardinassi; Beatriz R Ferreira; Tamy M Banin; Cecília J Veríssimo; Luciana M Katiki; Isabel K F de Miranda-Santos
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 7.344

4.  A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks.

Authors:  J K Marima; C L Nel; M C Marufu; N N Jonsson; B Dube; K Dzama
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Cellular responses to Rhipicephalus microplus infestations in pre-sensitised cattle with differing phenotypes of infestation.

Authors:  Munyaradzi C Marufu; Kennedy Dzama; Michael Chimonyo
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Transcriptional changes in the peripheral blood leukocytes from Brangus cattle before and after tick challenge with Rhipicephalus australis.

Authors:  Emily F Mantilla Valdivieso; Elizabeth M Ross; Ali Raza; Muhammad Noman Naseem; Muhammad Kamran; Ben J Hayes; Nicholas N Jonsson; Peter James; Ala E Tabor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.547

7.  Comparison of tick resistance of crossbred Senepol × Limousin to purebred Limousin cattle.

Authors:  Thomas Hüe; Jean-Claude Hurlin; Magali Teurlai; Michel Naves
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Influence of tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia) on the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Rafael Pazinato; Vanderlei Klauck; Andreia Volpato; Alexandre A Tonin; Roberto C Santos; Márcia E de Souza; Rodrigo A Vaucher; Renata Raffin; Patrícia Gomes; Candice C Felippi; Lenita M Stefani; Aleksandro S Da Silva
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Rhipicephalus microplus serine protease inhibitor family: annotation, expression and functional characterisation assessment.

Authors:  Manuel Rodriguez-Valle; Tao Xu; Sebastian Kurscheid; Ala E Lew-Tabor
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Alessandra Mara Franzin; Sandra Regina Maruyama; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Rosane Pereira Oliveira; José Marcos Chaves Ribeiro; Richard Bishop; Antônio Augusto Mendes Maia; Daniela Dantas Moré; Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira; Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.