Literature DB >> 20109300

Urine drug testing of chronic pain patients. II. Prevalence patterns of prescription opiates and metabolites.

Rebecca Heltsley1, Anne Zichterman, David L Black, Beverly Cawthon, Tim Robert, Frank Moser, Yale H Caplan, Edward J Cone.   

Abstract

This study of 20,089 urine specimens from chronic pain patients provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the prevalence of prescription opiates and metabolites, assess the usefulness of inclusion of normetabolites in the test panel, and compare opiate and oxycodone screening results to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) results. All specimens were screened by an opiate [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 100 ng/mL] and oxycodone assay [ELISA, 100 ng/mL or enzyme immunoassay (EIA), 50 ng/mL] and simultaneously tested by LC-MS-MS [limit of quantitation (LOQ) = 50 ng/mL] for 10 opiate analytes (codeine, norcodeine, morphine, hydrocodone, dihydrocodeine, norhydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, noroxycodone, and oxymorphone). Approximately two-thirds of the specimens were positive for one or more opiate analytes. The number of analytes detected in each specimen varied from 1 to 8 with 3 (34.8%) being most prevalent. Hydrocodone and oxycodone (in combination with metabolites) were most prevalent followed by morphine. Norcodeine was only infrequently detected whereas the prevalence of norhydrocodone and noroxycodone was approximately equal to the prevalence of the parent drug. A substantial number of specimens were identified that contained norhydrocodone (n = 943) or noroxycodone (n = 702) but not the parent drug, thereby establishing their interpretative value as biomarkers of parent drug use. Comparison of the two oxycodone screening assays revealed that the oxycodone ELISA had broader cross-reactivity with opiate analytes, and the oxycodone EIA was more specific for oxycodone. Specimens containing only norhydrocodone were best detected with the opiate ELISA whereas noroxycodone (only) specimens were best detected by the oxycodone EIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20109300     DOI: 10.1093/jat/34.1.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory testing for prescription opioids.

Authors:  Michael C Milone
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-12

2.  Characteristics of statewide prescription drug monitoring programs and potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing to patients with non-cancer chronic pain: A machine learning application.

Authors:  Hsien-Chang Lin; Zhi Wang; Yi-Han Hu; Kosali Simon; Anne Buu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.637

Review 3.  Opioid addiction and abuse in primary care practice: a comparison of methadone and buprenorphine as treatment options.

Authors:  Jean Bonhomme; Ruth S Shim; Richard Gooden; Dawn Tyus; George Rust
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  The Quantification of Oxycodone and Its Phase I and II Metabolites in Urine.

Authors:  Michael T Truver; Gerd Jakobsson; Maria D Chermà; Madeleine J Swortwood; Henrik Gréen; Robert Kronstrand
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.367

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.