CONTEXT: Previous field research has not identified sweat rates (SR), fluid consumption (FC), or the efficacy of an educational intervention (EI) for youth during football camp. OBJECTIVE: To measure hydration status and rehydration performance and examine EL using these data. DESIGN: Observational with EI randomized comparison. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three boys (mean +/- SD: 12 +/- 2 y, 52.9 +/- 13.6 kg, 156 +/- 12 cm) volunteered during a 5-d camp with 3 (-2-h) sessions per day (WBGT: 25.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hydration status, SR, and FC. RESULTS:Urine osmolality averaged 796 +/- 293 mOsm/L for days 2-5. Game SR (1.30 +/- 0.57 L/h) was significantly greater than practice SR (0.65 +/- 0.35 L/h; P = .002). Subjects dehydrated during free time but matched fluid losses with FC (0.76 +/- 0.29 L/h) during football activities. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects arrived at camp hypohydrated and maintained this condition. They matched FC and SR during, but dehydrated when not playing, football. This may impair recovery and subsequent performance. Hydration EI seemed to have a positive influence on hydration practices.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Previous field research has not identified sweat rates (SR), fluid consumption (FC), or the efficacy of an educational intervention (EI) for youth during football camp. OBJECTIVE: To measure hydration status and rehydration performance and examine EL using these data. DESIGN: Observational with EI randomized comparison. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three boys (mean +/- SD: 12 +/- 2 y, 52.9 +/- 13.6 kg, 156 +/- 12 cm) volunteered during a 5-d camp with 3 (-2-h) sessions per day (WBGT: 25.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hydration status, SR, and FC. RESULTS: Urine osmolality averaged 796 +/- 293 mOsm/L for days 2-5. Game SR (1.30 +/- 0.57 L/h) was significantly greater than practice SR (0.65 +/- 0.35 L/h; P = .002). Subjects dehydrated during free time but matched fluid losses with FC (0.76 +/- 0.29 L/h) during football activities. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects arrived at camp hypohydrated and maintained this condition. They matched FC and SR during, but dehydrated when not playing, football. This may impair recovery and subsequent performance. Hydration EI seemed to have a positive influence on hydration practices.
Authors: Susan Walker Yeargin; Douglas J Casa; Daniel A Judelson; Brendon P McDermott; Matthew S Ganio; Elaine C Lee; Rebecca M Lopez; Rebecca L Stearns; Jeffrey M Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; William J Kraemer; Carl M Maresh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Brendon P McDermott; Scott A Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Douglas J Casa; Samuel N Cheuvront; Larry Cooper; W Larry Kenney; Francis G O'Connor; William O Roberts Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Michelle A Cleary; Ronald K Hetzler; Darcy Wasson; Jennifer J Wages; Christopher Stickley; Iris F Kimura Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: S A Kavouras; G Arnaoutis; M Makrillos; C Garagouni; E Nikolaou; O Chira; E Ellinikaki; L S Sidossis Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Matthew Negaard; Christopher Anthony; Daniel Bonthius; Matthew Jepson; Britt Marcussen; Daniel Pelzer; Andrew Peterson Journal: SAGE Open Med Case Rep Date: 2017-08-08