Literature DB >> 20108841

Minimal additional weight of combat equipment alters air assault soldiers' landing biomechanics.

Timothy C Sell1, Yungchien Chu, John P Abt, Takashi Nagai, Jennifer Deluzio, Mark A McGrail, Russell S Rowe, Scott M Lephart.   

Abstract

The additional weight of combat and protective equipment carried by soldiers on the battlefield and insufficient adaptations to this weight may increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the additional weight of equipment on knee kinematics and vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF) during two-legged drop landings. We tested kinematics and VGRF of 70 air assault soldiers performing drop landings with and without wearing the equipment. Maximum knee flexion angles, maximum vertical ground reaction forces, and the time from initial contact to these maximum values all increased with the additional weight of equipment. Proper landing technique, additional weight (perhaps in the form of combat and protective equipment), and eccentric strengthening of the hips and knees should be integrated into soldiers' training to induce musculoskeletal and biomechanical adaptations to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury during two-legged drop landing maneuvers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20108841     DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  Catastrophizing and pain in military personnel.

Authors:  Christopher Spevak; Chester Buckenmaier
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-04

2.  Effect of Jump Direction and External Load on Single-Legged Jump-Landing Biomechanics.

Authors:  Alexander J Hron; Colin W Bond; Benjamin C Noonan
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Landing Kinematics and Kinetics at the Knee During Different Landing Tasks.

Authors:  Nicholas R Heebner; Deirdre M Rafferty; Meleesa F Wohleber; Andrew J Simonson; Mita Lovalekar; Andrew Reinert; Timothy C Sell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Sex and limb impact biomechanics associated with risk of injury during drop landing with body borne load.

Authors:  Kayla D Seymore; AuraLea C Fain; Nicholas J Lobb; Tyler N Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Body-worn IMU array reveals effects of load on performance in an outdoor obstacle course.

Authors:  Rachel V Vitali; Stephen M Cain; Lauro V Ojeda; Michael V Potter; Antonia M Zaferiou; Steven P Davidson; Megan E Coyne; Clifford L Hancock; Alyssa Mendoza; Leia A Stirling; Noel C Perkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Monitoring Neuromuscular Performance in Military Personnel.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason D Stone; Andrew G Thompson; W Guy Hornsby; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Peak vertical ground reaction force during two-leg landing: a systematic review and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Wenxin Niu; Tienan Feng; Chenghua Jiang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters.

Authors:  Boyi Dai; Jacob S Layer; Taylour J Hinshaw; Ross F Cook; Janet S Dufek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Protection by Ankle Brace for Lower-Extremity Joints in Half-Squat Parachuting Landing With a Backpack.

Authors:  Tianyun Jiang; Shan Tian; Tianhong Chen; Xingyu Fan; Jie Yao; Lizhen Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.