Literature DB >> 20108306

Should all patients with melanoma between 1 and 2 mm Breslow thickness undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy?

Michael P Mays1, Robert C G Martin, Alison Burton, Brooke Ginter, Michael J Edwards, Douglas S Reintgen, Merrick I Ross, Marshall M Urist, Arnold J Stromberg, Kelly M McMasters, Charles R Scoggins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy generally is recommended for patients who have melanoma with a Breslow thickness > or = 1 mm. Most patients with melanoma between 1 mm and 2 mm thick have tumor-negative SLNs and an excellent long-term prognosis. The objective of the current study was to evaluate prognostic factors in this subset of patients and determine whether all such patients require SLN biopsy.
METHODS: Patients with melanoma between 1 mm and 2 mm in Breslow thickness were evaluated from a prospective multi-institutional study of SLN biopsy for melanoma. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare patients with melanoma that measured from 1.0 mm to 1.59 mm (Group A) versus patients with melanoma that measured from > or = 1.6 mm to 2.0 mm thick (Group B). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of tumor-positive SLN status, DFS, and OS.
RESULTS: The current analysis included 1110 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. SLN status was tumor-positive in 133 of 1110 patients (12%) including 66 of 762 patients (8.7%) in Group A and 67 of 348 patients (19.3%) in Group B (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, age, Breslow thickness, and lymphovascular invasion were independently predictive of a tumor-positive SLN (P < .05). DFS (P < .0001) and OS (P = .0001) were significantly better for Group A than for Group B. When tumor thickness was treated as either a continuous variable (P < 0.0001) or a categorical variable (P < .0001), it was significantly predictive of DFS and OS. On multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness, age, ulceration, histologic subtype, regression, Clark level, and SLN status were significant factors predicting DFS; and Breslow thickness, age, primary tumor location, sex, ulceration, and SLN status were significant factors predicting OS (P < .05). A subgroup of patients who had tumors <1.6 mm in Breslow thickness, had no lymphovascular invasion, and were aged > or = 59 years had a low risk (5%) of tumor-positive SLN.
CONCLUSIONS: The current findings indicated that there is significant diversity in the biologic behavior of melanoma between 1 mm and 2 mm in Breslow thickness. SLN biopsy is recommended for all such patients to identify those with lymph node metastasis who are at the greatest risk of recurrence and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20108306     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Melanoma and nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Andrés Perissinotti; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Omgo Nieweg; Renato Valdés Olmos
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-09-05

2.  Long-term follow-up and survival of patients following a recurrence of melanoma after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Teresa S Jones; Nathan W Pearlman; Dexiang Gao; Robert Stovall; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Rene Gonzalez; Karl D Lewis; William A Robinson; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Identification of Patients with Intermediate Thickness Melanoma at Low Risk for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Madalyn G Peters; Anne Blair; Mark S Etherington; David E Elder; Xiaowei G Xu; DuPont Guerry; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Phyllis A Gimotty; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  [Malignant head and neck melanoma: Part 2: Therapy].

Authors:  C Pföhler; T Vogt; C S L Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Melanoma & nuclear medicine: new insights & advances.

Authors:  Andrés Perissinotti; Daphne Dd Rietbergen; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Ana A Riera; Renato A Valdés Olmos
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2018-06-28

6.  Evolving management of positive regional lymph nodes in melanoma: Past, present and future directions.

Authors:  Rachel A Fayne; Francisco I Macedo; Steven E Rodgers; Mecker G Möller
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2019-11-28

Review 7.  Skin Cancer Research Goes Digital: Looking for Biomarkers within the Droplets.

Authors:  Elena-Georgiana Dobre; Carolina Constantin; Monica Neagu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  Malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Aída Ortega Candil; Cristina Rodríguez Rey; José Luis Carreras Delgado
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 9.  Update and Review on the Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Solmaz Niknam Leilabadi; Amie Chen; Stacy Tsai; Vinaya Soundararajan; Howard Silberman; Alex K Wong
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.