Literature DB >> 2010783

Errors in reporting cervical screening among public health clinic patients.

R Michielutte1, M B Dignan, H B Wells, J Bahnson, M Smith, R Wooten, L N Hale.   

Abstract

This study examines women's knowledge of whether or not they had a cervical smear as part of their examination in a public health clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. Usable interviews were completed with a cluster sample of 318 women. Approximately 56% of the women were not able to correctly report if they had a cervical smear; and 90% of the erroneous responses consisted of reporting a cervical smear when none actually was done. Young women and single women were more likely to report incorrectly. Overall, the results suggest considerable error in overreporting cervical screening in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2010783     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90078-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Inconsistencies between medical records and patient-reported recommendations for follow-up after abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  Stacey Slone; Carol White; Brent Shelton; Emily Van Meter; Christopher DeSimone; Nancy Schoenberg; Mark Dignan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Effect of concurrent lower genital tract infections on cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; M E Zajackowski
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-10

3.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  From human papillomavirus (HPV) to cervical cancer: psychosocial processes in infection, detection, and control.

Authors:  S M Miller; W Mischel; A O'Leary; M Mills
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996

5.  The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha Lofters; Mandana Vahabi; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methods.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Gennaro Esposito; Silvia Brezzi; Angela Brachini; Patrizio Raggi; Antonio Federici
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.