Literature DB >> 20107690

Descriptive analysis of immunization policy decision making in the Americas.

Julianne E Burns1, Rachel C Mitrovich, Barbara Jauregui, Cuauhtémoc Ruiz Matus, Jon K Andrus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reducing and eliminating vaccine-preventable diseases requires evidence-based and informed policy decision making. Critical to determining the functionality of the decision-making process for introduction of a new vaccine is understanding the role of the national immunization technical advisory group (ITAG) in each country. The aim of this study is to document the current situation of national level immunization policy decision making for use in the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) ProVac Initiative.
METHODS: A structured 66-variable questionnaire developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the University of Ottawa was distributed to all WHO regions; it was composed of dichotomous, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions. Questionnaires were e-mailed or faxed to the six WHO regional offices and the offices distributed them to all member states. This paper analyzes surveys from the Americas as part of PAHO's ProVac Initiative.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine countries of the Americas answered the survey. They conveyed that immunization policy making needed to be improved and further supported by organizations such as PAHO. Areas of improvement ranged from organization and technical support to strengthening capacity and infrastructure to improved coordination among stakeholders. This survey also highlighted a variety of ITAG processes that need further investigation.
CONCLUSION: This survey supports the efforts of PAHO's ProVac Initiative to disseminate knowledge and best practices for an immunization policy decision-making framework through the development of clear definitions and guidelines. By highlighting each problem noted in this study, ProVac will assist countries in Latin America and the Caribbean to build national capacity for making evidence-based decisions about introduction of new vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20107690     DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892009001100003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica        ISSN: 1020-4989


  5 in total

1.  Enhancing the work of the Department of Health and Human Services national vaccine program in global immunization: recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on September 12, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Comparative evaluation of the potential impact of rotavirus versus HPV vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries: a preliminary analysis focused on the relative disease burden.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Steven Sweet; Joshua Chang; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Results from evaluations of models and cost-effectiveness tools to support introduction decisions for new vaccines need critical appraisal.

Authors:  Raymond Hutubessy; Ana Maria Henao; Pem Namgyal; Vasee Moorthy; Joachim Hombach
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Stakeholders' perception on including broader economic impact of vaccines in economic evaluations in low and middle income countries: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Ingeborg M van der Putten; Silvia M A A Evers; Rohan Deogaonkar; Mark Jit; Raymond C W Hutubessy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Health System Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Additional Vaccines through the National Immunisation Programme in China: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Service-User Perspectives.

Authors:  Dan Gong; Qiyun Jiang; Tracey Chantler; Fiona Yueqian Sun; Jiatong Zou; Jiejie Cheng; Yuqian Chen; Chengyue Li; Mei Sun; Natasha Howard
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.