Literature DB >> 20107368

Standardizing and personalizing science in medical education.

David R Lambert1, Stephen J Lurie, Jeffrey M Lyness, Denham S Ward.   

Abstract

In the century since the initial publication of the Flexner Report, medical education has emphasized a broad knowledge of science and a fundamental understanding of the scientific method, which medical educators believe are essential to the practice of medicine. The enormous growth of scientific knowledge that underlies clinical practice has challenged medical schools to accommodate this new information within the curricula. Although innovative educational modalities and new curricula have partly addressed this growth, the authors argue for a systematic restructuring of the content and structure of science education from the premedical setting through clinical practice. The overarching goal of science education is to provide students with a broad, solid foundation applicable to medicine, a deep understanding of the scientific method, and the attitudes and skills needed to apply new knowledge to patient care throughout their careers. The authors believe that to accomplish this successfully, the following changes must occur across the three major stages of medical education: (1) a reshaping of the scientific preparation that all students complete before medical school, (2) an increase in individualized science education during medical school, and (3) an emphasis on knowledge acquisition skills throughout graduate medical education and beyond to assure lifelong scientific learning. As students progress through the educational continuum, the balance of standardized and personalized scientific knowledge will shift toward personalization. Greater personalization demands that physicians possess well-refined skills in information acquisition, interpretation, and application for optimal lifelong learning and effective clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107368     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c87f73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  The Flipped Classroom: An Innovative Approach to Medical Education in Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Chris R Alabiad; Kevin J Moore; David P Green; Matthew Kofoed; Alex J Mechaber; Carol L Karp
Journal:  J Acad Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07

2.  Statistical trends in the Journal of the American Medical Association and implications for training across the continuum of medical education.

Authors:  Lauren D Arnold; Melissa Braganza; Rondek Salih; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Statistical Use in Clinical Studies: Is There Evidence of a Methodological Shift?

Authors:  Dali Yi; Dihui Ma; Gaoming Li; Liang Zhou; Qin Xiao; Yanqi Zhang; Xiaoyu Liu; Hongru Chen; Julia Christine Pettigrew; Dong Yi; Ling Liu; Yazhou Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Nanomedicine concepts in the general medical curriculum: initiating a discussion.

Authors:  Aldrin E Sweeney
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-12-07

5.  A Randomized Crossover Design to Assess Learning Impact and Student Preference for Active and Passive Online Learning Modules.

Authors:  Amy J Prunuske; Lisa Henn; Ann M Brearley; Jacob Prunuske
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2015-12-21

6.  Inoculating a New Generation: Immunology in Medical Education.

Authors:  Constantine G Haidaris; John G Frelinger
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.561

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.