Literature DB >> 20107058

Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones.

Jaakko Kauramäki1, Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Riitta Hari, Riikka Möttönen, Josef P Rauschecker, Mikko Sams.   

Abstract

Watching the lips of a speaker enhances speech perception. At the same time, the 100 ms response to speech sounds is suppressed in the observer's auditory cortex. Here, we used whole-scalp 306-channel magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study whether lipreading modulates human auditory processing already at the level of the most elementary sound features, i.e., pure tones. We further envisioned the temporal dynamics of the suppression to tell whether the effect is driven by top-down influences. Nineteen subjects were presented with 50 ms tones spanning six octaves (125-8000 Hz) (1) during "lipreading," i.e., when they watched video clips of silent articulations of Finnish vowels /a/, /i/, /o/, and /y/, and reacted to vowels presented twice in a row; (2) during a visual control task; (3) during a still-face passive control condition; and (4) in a separate experiment with a subset of nine subjects, during covert production of the same vowels. Auditory-cortex 100 ms responses (N100m) were equally suppressed in the lipreading and covert-speech-production tasks compared with the visual control and baseline tasks; the effects involved all frequencies and were most prominent in the left hemisphere. Responses to tones presented at different times with respect to the onset of the visual articulation showed significantly increased N100m suppression immediately after the articulatory gesture. These findings suggest that the lipreading-related suppression in the auditory cortex is caused by top-down influences, possibly by an efference copy from the speech-production system, generated during both own speech and lipreading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107058      PMCID: PMC2832801          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1950-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  63 in total

1.  The timing and laminar profile of converging inputs to multisensory areas of the macaque neocortex.

Authors:  Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

2.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper; Virginie van Wassenhove; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech.

Authors:  Ingrid K Christoffels; Elia Formisano; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex, II. Thalamocortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett; Lisa A De La Mothe; Istvan Ulbert; George Karmos; John Smiley; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Formant transition-specific adaptation by lipreading of left auditory cortex N1m.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jaakko Kauramäki; Juuso Tujunen; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Sparse representation of sounds in the unanesthetized auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tomás Hromádka; Michael R Deweese; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Auditory and visual cortex of primates: a comparison of two sensory systems.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Silent lipreading and covert speech production suppress processing of non-linguistic sounds in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Marja H Balk; Heini Kari; Jaakko Kauramäki; Jyrki Ahveninen; Mikko Sams; Taina Autti; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Open J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-06

4.  The corollary discharge in humans is related to synchronous neural oscillations.

Authors:  Chi-Ming A Chen; Daniel H Mathalon; Brian J Roach; Idil Cavus; Dennis D Spencer; Judith M Ford
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  An ALE meta-analysis on the audiovisual integration of speech signals.

Authors:  Laura C Erickson; Elizabeth Heeg; Josef P Rauschecker; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Can you hear me yet? An intracranial investigation of speech and non-speech audiovisual interactions in human cortex.

Authors:  Ariane E Rhone; Kirill V Nourski; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-21

8.  Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.

Authors:  Jaakko Kauramäki; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jarno L Hänninen; Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Jouko Lampinen; Mikko Sams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using TMS to study the role of the articulatory motor system in speech perception.

Authors:  Riikka Möttönen; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Auditory cortical deactivation during speech production and following speech perception: an EEG investigation of the temporal dynamics of the auditory alpha rhythm.

Authors:  David Jenson; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; Andrew L Bowers; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.