Literature DB >> 20106604

Complications after sphincter-saving resection in rectal cancer patients according to whether chemoradiotherapy is performed before or after surgery.

Chan Wook Kim1, Jong Hoon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Ui Sup Shin, Jin Seok Park, Kwang Yong Jung, Tae Won Kim, Sang Nam Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with postoperative CRT on the incidence and types of postoperative complications in rectal cancer patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 285 patients who received preoperative CRT and 418 patients who received postoperative CRT between January 2000 and December 2006.
RESULTS: There was no between-group difference in age, gender, or cancer stage. In the pre-CRT group, the mean level of anastomosis from the anal verge was lower (3.5 +/- 1.4 cm vs. 4.3 +/- 1.7 cm, p < 0.001) and the rate of T4 lesion and temporary diverting ileostomy was higher than in the post-CRT group. Delayed anastomotic leakage and rectovaginal fistulae developed more frequently in the pre-CRT group than in the post-CRT group (3.9% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.020, 6.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.027, respectively). Small bowel obstruction (arising from radiation enteritis) requiring surgical intervention was more frequent in the post-CRT group (0% in the pre-CRT group vs. 1.4% in the post-CRT group, p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative CRT as an independent risk factor for fistulous complications (delayed anastomotic leakage, rectovaginal fistula, rectovesical fistula), and postoperative CRT as a risk factor for obstructive complications (anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction). The stoma-free rates were significantly lower in the pre-CRT group than in the post-CRT group (5-year stoma-free rates: 92.8% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: The overall postoperative complication rates were similar between the pre-CRT and the Post-CRT groups. However, the pattern of postoperative complications seen after sphincter- saving resection differed with reference to the timing of CRT. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106604     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Protective ileostomy increased the incidence of rectal stenosis after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Shanshan Li; Xin Jin; Xian Wu; Zhiyuan Zhang; Lijun Shen; Juefeng Wan; Yan Wang; Yaqi Wang; Wang Yang; Menglong Zhou; Jing Zhang; Tao Lv; Yun Deng; Fan Xia; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.309

3.  Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bong Kyung Bae; Min Kyu Kang; Jae-Chul Kim; Mi Young Kim; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jong Gwang Kim; Byung Woog Kang; Hye Jin Kim; Soo Yeun Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 4.  Controversial issues in radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-12-29

5.  Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianguo Yang; Yajun Luo; Tingting Tian; Peng Dong; Zhongxue Fu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Anal fistula metastasis of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a case report.

Authors:  Shota Fukai; Shingo Tsujinaka; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Natsumi Matsuzawa; Yuuri Hatsuzawa; Ryo Maemoto; Nao Kakizawa; Toshiki Rikiyama
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 7.  German S3-Guideline: rectovaginal fistula.

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Thomas Schiedeck; Marco Sailer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.