Literature DB >> 20106588

Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostate cancer.

Jutta Engel1, Patrick J Bastian, Helmut Baur, Volker Beer, Christian Chaussy, Juergen E Gschwend, Ralph Oberneder, Karl H Rothenberger, Christian G Stief, Dieter Hölzel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive lymph node (LN) status is considered a systemic disease state. In prostate cancer, LN-positive diagnosis during pelvic LN dissection (PLND) potentially leads to the abandonment of radical prostatectomy (RP).
OBJECTIVE: To compare the overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS; as an estimate for cancer-specific survival) in LN-positive patients with or without RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 1988 and 2007, a total of 35 629 men with prostate cancer were identified at the Munich Cancer Registry; of those, 1413 patients had positive LNs. INTERVENTION: Of these 1413 LN-positive patients, prostatectomy was abandoned in 456 LN-positive patients, whereas 957 underwent RP despite the LN-positive finding. MEASUREMENTS: Crucial analyses are based on 938 LN-positive patients (688 with RP and 250 without RP) with complete data regarding age, grade, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). OS (Kaplan-Meier estimates) and RS are presented, and Cox regression analysis was used to show the influence of predictors such as clinical stage, age at surgery, number of positive LNs, PSA level, grade, and extent of surgery.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.6 yr. OS of patients at 5 yr and 10 yr was 84% and 64%, respectively, with RP and was 60% and 28%, respectively, with aborted RP. The RS of patients at 5 yr and 10 yr was 95% and 86%, respectively, with RP and was 70% and 40%, respectively, with abandoned surgery. There was an imbalance, however, in the number of positive LNs: 17.2% with RP had four or more positive nodes versus 28% in the patient group without RP. In the multivariate model, RP was a strong independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio: 2.04 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.63; p<0.0001]).
CONCLUSION: LN-positive patients with complete RP had improved survival compared to patients with abandoned RP. These results suggest that RP may have a survival benefit and the abandonment of RP in node-positive cases may not be justified.
Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106588     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  77 in total

Review 1.  [Prostate cancer].

Authors:  J Noldus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Favorable outcome of intraoperative radiotherapy to the primary site in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kanda; Syohei Fukuda; Naotaka Fukui; Yu Ohkubo; Tomoko Kazumoto; Yoshihiro Saito; Ayataka Ishikawa; Masafumi Kurosumi; Yukio Kageyama; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of the genitourinary tract].

Authors:  S Bertz; B J Schmitz-Dräger; C Protzel; A Hartmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Integrating chemohormonal therapy and surgery in known or suspected lymph node metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  A J Zurita; L L Pisters; X Wang; P Troncoso; P Dieringer; J F Ward; J W Davis; C A Pettaway; C J Logothetis; L C Pagliaro
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Prostate cancer: The role of local therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Tosco; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramkishen Narayanan; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  [When is surgical treatment indicated in metastatic prostate cancer and what is the scientific rationale?]

Authors:  A Kretschmer; A Herlemann; C G Stief; C Gratzke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Radical prostatectomy as part of a multimodal concept for patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases at initial diagnosis].

Authors:  A Spek; A Herlemann; C Gratzke; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Intraoperative finding of gross lymph node metastasis during robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wooju Jeong; Shyam Sukumar; Firas Petros; Mani Menon; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.