Literature DB >> 20106395

Is the "sterile cockpit" concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Rishi K Wadhera1, Sarah Henrickson Parker, Harold M Burkhart, Kevin L Greason, James R Neal, Katherine M Levenick, Douglas A Wiegmann, Thoralf M Sundt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is general enthusiasm for applying strategies from aviation directly to medical care; the application of the "sterile cockpit" rule to surgery has accordingly been suggested. An implicit prerequisite to the evidence-based transfer of such a concept to the clinical domain, however, is definition of periods of high mental workload analogous to takeoff and landing. We measured cognitive demands among operating room staff, mapped critical events, and evaluated protocol-driven communication.
METHODS: With the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and semistructured focus groups, we identified common critical stages of cardiac surgical cases. Intraoperative communication was assessed before (n = 18) and after (n = 16) introduction of a structured communication protocol.
RESULTS: Cognitive workload measures demonstrated high temporal diversity among caregivers in various roles. Eight critical events during cardiopulmonary bypass were then defined. A structured, unambiguous verbal communication protocol for these events was then implemented. Observations of 18 cases before implementation including 29.6 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass with 632 total communication exchanges (average 35.1 exchanges/case) were compared with observations of 16 cases after implementation including 23.9 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass with 748 exchanges (average 46.8 exchanges/case, P = .06). Frequency of communication breakdowns per case decreased significantly after implementation (11.5 vs 7.3 breakdowns/case, P = .008).
CONCLUSIONS: Because of wide variations is cognitive workload among caregivers, effective communication can be structured around critical events rather than defined intervals analogous to the sterile cockpit, with reduction in communication breakdowns. 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106395     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  22 in total

1.  D'où venons-nous/que somes nous/où allons nous? Accidents are inevitable.

Authors:  Timothy W Willcox
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Factors influencing surgeons' intraoperative leadership: video analysis of unanticipated events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sarah Henrickson Parker; Rhona Flin; Aileen McKinley; Steven Yule
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Effects of the no interruption zone on distraction levels, withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nancy S Behazin; Michelle Thompson; Mena Milad; Jeffrey Hart; Juhee Song; Mark Jeffries; Dawn M Sears
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Noise in the Operating Room Distracts Members of the Surgical Team. An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sandra Keller; Franziska Tschan; Norbert K Semmer; Eliane Holzer; Daniel Candinas; Mark Brink; Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Physiological synchronization and entropy as measures of team cognitive load.

Authors:  Roger D Dias; Marco A Zenati; Ronald Stevens; Jennifer M Gabany; Steven J Yule
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  The effect of intraoperative distractions on severe technical events in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Suzan Ayas; Lauren Gordon; Birsen Donmez; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Does Standardizing Extracorporeal Circuit Design for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Affect Outcomes? Results from a National Perfusion Registry.

Authors:  Alfred H Stammers; Linda B Mongero; Eric A Tesdahl; Thomas Coley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2019-12

8.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Importance of high-performing teams in the cardiovascular intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren R Kennedy-Metz; Atilio Barbeito; Roger D Dias; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Analysis of Dynamic Changes in Cognitive Workload During Cardiac Surgery Perfusionists' Interactions With the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Pump.

Authors:  Lauren R Kennedy-Metz; Roger D Dias; Rithy Srey; Geoffrey C Rance; Heather M Conboy; Miguel E Haime; Jacquelyn A Quin; Steven J Yule; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.