Literature DB >> 20106358

Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.

Philip A R Hayward1, Ian R Gordon, David L Hare, George Matalanis, Mark L Horrigan, Alexander Rosalion, Brian F Buxton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimum conduit for coronary targets other than the left anterior descending artery, we evaluated long-term patencies and clinical outcomes of the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, and saphenous vein through the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.
METHODS: As part of a 10-year prospective, randomized, single-center trial, patients undergoing primary coronary surgery were allocated to the radial artery (n = 198) or free right internal thoracic artery (n = 196) if aged less than 70 years (group 1), or radial artery (n = 113) or saphenous vein (n = 112) if aged at least 70 years (group 2). All patients received a left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending, and the randomized conduit was used to graft the second largest target. Protocol-directed angiography has been performed at randomly assigned intervals, weighted toward the end of the study period. Grafts are defined as failed if there was occlusion, string sign, or greater than 80% stenosis, independently reported by 3 assessors. Analysis is by intention to treat.
RESULTS: At mean follow up of 5.5 years, protocol angiography has been performed in groups 1 and 2 in 237 and 113 patients, respectively. There are no significant differences within each group in preoperative comorbidity, age, or urgency. Patencies were similar for either of the 2 conduits in each group (log rank analysis, P = .06 and P = .54, respectively). The differences in estimated 5-year patencies were 6.6% (radial minus right internal thoracic artery) in group 1 and 2.9% (radial minus saphenous vein graft) in group 2.
CONCLUSION: At mean 5-year angiography in largely asymptomatic patients, the selection of arterial or venous conduit for the second graft has not significantly affected patency. This finding offers surgeons, for now, enhanced flexibility in planning revascularization. Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106358     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  27 in total

1.  Long term outcomes of radial artery grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  James Tatoulis; Thomas A Schwann
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

2.  How I choose conduits and configure grafts for my patients-rationales and practices.

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 3.  Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery : which conduit offers better efficacy?

Authors:  H Zhang; Z W Wang; H B Wu; X P Hu; Z Zhou; P Xu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  Current trends in selection of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Thierry Carrel; Bernhard Winkler
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-09

6.  Transatlantic editorial: the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in Europe and North America.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Joanna Chikwe; Volkmar Falk; Jennifer S Lawton; John D Puskas; David P Taggart
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Radial artery and right internal thoracic artery: jousting for the throne of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Massimo Baudo; Mario Gaudino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

8.  Endoscopic harvesting device type and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; J Matthew Brennan; Gail E Hafley; Eric M Reyes; Keith B Allen; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson; Judson B Williams; C Michael Gibson; Michael J Mack; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Mid-term outcomes of total arterial revascularization versus conventional coronary surgery in isolated three-vessel coronary disease.

Authors:  Jin Woo Chung; Joon Bum Kim; Sung Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Hyun Song; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Strategies for the coronary surgeon to remain "competitive and co-operative" in the PCI era.

Authors:  George Jose Valooran; Shiv Kumar Nair; Krishnan Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.