Literature DB >> 20105548

Comparative grazing behavior of lactating Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Jersey x Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and its association with intake capacity and production efficiency.

R Prendiville1, E Lewis, K M Pierce, F Buckley.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate differences in grazing behavior among Holstein-Friesian (HF), Jersey (JE), and Jersey x Holstein-Friesian (F(1)) cows under an intensive, seasonal, grass-based environment and to determine whether associations exist among grazing behavior, intake capacity, and production efficiency. Data from a total of 108 animals (37 HF, 34 JE, and 37F(1)) were available for analysis. Measurements included milk production, body weight (BW), intake, and grazing behavior. Breed group had a significant effect on all of the production, grass dry matter intake, and efficiency parameters investigated. No differences were observed among the breeds for grazing time, number of grazing bouts, grazing bout duration, and total number of bites. Grazing mastications were higher for the JE cows compared with the HF cows. Grass dry matter intake per bite and rate of intake per minute were higher for the HF cows compared with the JE cows. Large differences between the breeds were apparent when grazing behavior measurements were expressed per unit of BW and per unit of intake. In absolute terms, the HF cows spent more time ruminating and had more mastications during rumination than the JE cows. However, when expressed per unit of BW, ruminating time was greater for the JE cows and they tended to have more ruminating mastications compared with the HF cows. Despite these differences, ruminating time and ruminating mastications per unit of intake were similar for the 2 breeds. For the most part, the F(1) cows tended to be similar to the mid-parent mean, but results showed an increase in biting rate, lower grazing duration per bout, and a tendency to achieve a high intake per bite compared with the average of the parent breeds. The results obtained also indicate that inherent grazing and ruminating differences exist between cows varying in intake capacity and production efficiency. Cows with higher intake capacities have increased grazing time and rate of intake per unit of BW. Increased production efficiency, on the other hand, appears to be aided, in particular by improvements in mastication behavior during grazing. Copyright 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20105548     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in time budgets and milk yield for Jersey, Friesland and crossbred cows raised in a pasture-based system.

Authors:  Madodana S Dodzi; Voster Muchenje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Herbage mass and allowance and animal genotype affect daily herbage intake, productivity, and efficiency of beef cows grazing native subtropical grassland.

Authors:  Martin Do Carmo; Teresa C M Genro; Andrés F Cibils; Pablo M Soca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Rumen Bacterial Community Composition in Holstein and Jersey Cows Is Different under Same Dietary Condition and Is Not Affected by Sampling Method.

Authors:  Henry A Paz; Christopher L Anderson; Makala J Muller; Paul J Kononoff; Samodha C Fernando
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Impact of cow strain and concentrate supplementation on grazing behaviour, milk yield and metabolic state of dairy cows in an organic pasture-based feeding system.

Authors:  C Heublein; F Dohme-Meier; K-H Südekum; R M Bruckmaier; S Thanner; F Schori
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Effect of Frequency of Fresh Pasture Allocation on the Feeding Behaviour of High Production Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jessica G Pollock; Alan W Gordon; Kathryn M Huson; Deborah A McConnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Heat Stress: Effects on Rumen Microbes and Host Physiology, and Strategies to Alleviate the Negative Impacts on Lactating Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Seon Ho Kim; Sonny C Ramos; Raniel A Valencia; Yong Il Cho; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Performance and milk quality parameters of Jersey crossbreds in low-input dairy systems.

Authors:  Sabrina Ormston; Hannah Davis; Gillian Butler; Eleni Chatzidimitriou; Alan W Gordon; Katerina Theodoridou; Sharon Huws; Tianhai Yan; Carlo Leifert; Sokratis Stergiadis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Economic values for production, fertility and mastitis traits for temperate dairy cattle breeds in tropical Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Amali Malshani Samaraweera; Julius H J van der Werf; Vinzent Boerner; Susanne Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  The effects of treading by two breeds of dairy cow with different live weights on soil physical properties, poaching damage and herbage production on a poorly drained clay-loam soil.

Authors:  P Tuohy; O Fenton; N M Holden; J Humphreys
Journal:  J Agric Sci       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.476

10.  Effect of genotype on duodenal expression of nutrient transporter genes in dairy cows.

Authors:  Sinéad M Waters; Kate Keogh; Frank Buckley; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.