Literature DB >> 20105197

Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study.

Enrico Agliardi1, Stefano Panigatti, Matteo Clericò, Cristina Villa, Paulo Malò.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediately loaded full-arch fixed prostheses supported by a combination of axially and non-axially positioned implants in a large cohort of patients with completely edentulous jaws, up to 5 years of function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three edentulous patients (80 males and 93 females) were enrolled according to specific selection criteria. Each patient received a full-arch fixed prosthesis supported by two distal tilted implants and two anterior axially placed implants. The provisional functional acrylic prosthesis was delivered the same day as surgery in all cases. All cases were finalized 4-6 months later. The patients were scheduled for follow-up at 6 and 12 months of function, and annually up to 5 years. At each follow-up plaque and bleeding score was assessed and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level was performed.
RESULTS: The overall follow-up range was 4-59 months. A total of 154 immediately loaded prostheses (61 in the maxilla and 93 in the mandible) were in function for at least 1 year and were considered for the analysis. Four axially placed implants failed in the maxilla and one tilted implant in the mandible, all within 6 months of loading. No further implant failure occurred to date. Implant survival at 1 year was 98.36% and 99.73% for the maxilla and the mandible, respectively. Marginal bone loss at 1 year averaged 0.9+/-0.7 mm in the maxilla (204 implants) and 1.2+/-0.9 mm in the mandible (292 implants). No difference was found in marginal bone loss between axial and tilted implants. Plaque and bleeding scores progressively improved from 6 to 12 months. Fracture of the acrylic prosthesis occurred in 14% of total cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The present preliminary results from a relatively large sample size suggest that the present technique can be considered a viable treatment option for the immediate rehabilitation of both mandible and maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20105197     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01852.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  19 in total

1.  Immediate loading of one-piece implants in conjunction with a modified technique of inferior alveolar nerve lateralization: 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Riham Eldibany; Joaquin G Rodriguez
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-01-13

2.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

3.  Evaluation of immediately loaded mandibular four vertical versus tilted posterior implants supporting fixed detachable restorations without versus with posterior cantilevers.

Authors:  Latifa Abdallah Mohamed; Mohamed Moataz Khamis; Ahlam Mostafa El-Sharkawy; Rania Abdelaziz Fahmy
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-08-29

4.  Oral rehabilitation with tilted dental implants: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Javier Ata-Ali; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Eugenia Candel-Marti; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Effects of Immediate and Delayed Loading on the Outcomes of All-on-4 Treatment: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi; Hakimeh Siadat; Solmaz Akbari; Amirreza Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

6.  Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hye-Sung Kim; Han-A Cho; Young Youn Kim; Hosung Shin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Cappare; Gianpaolo Sannino; Margherita Minoli; Pietro Montemezzi; Francesco Ferrini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Zirconia crowns cemented on titanium bars using CAD/CAM: a five-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 9 patients.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Marco Stoppaccioli; Tommaso Casolino
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla.

Authors:  David Offord; Grant Mathieson; Nicola Kingsford; Carine Matthys; Maarten Glibert; Hugo De Bruyn
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2017-09-08

10.  The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Fariba Saleh Saber; Shima Ghasemi; Rodabeh Koodaryan; Amirreza Babaloo; Nader Abolfazli
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.