BACKGROUND: Lack of first-phase insulin (INS) secretion is regarded as causative for high postprandial glucose excursions in subjects with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine the impact of early INS secretion on postprandial glycemia. METHODS:Twenty subjects with type 2 diabetes (age 54 +/- 8 years, body mass index 28.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2) [mean +/- SD]) underwent a hyperglycemic glucose clamp and a meal test twice separated by a washout period of 4 weeks. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify determinants of postprandial glycemia. RESULTS: During hyperglycemic glucose clamps eight subjects showed a preserved first-phase INS secretion (P1+), whereas 12 subjects showed none (P1-). Both subject groups differed in fasting blood glucose (BG) (116 +/- 7 vs. 147 +/- 31 mg/dL, P = 0.011) and glycosylated hemoglobin (6.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 0.8, P = 0.041). Total INS secretory response during glucose clamps was higher in P1+ than P1- (INS-area under the concentration vs. time curve [AUC](0-120 min) 6.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 3.2 +/- 2.1 mU.min/mL; P = 0.006). During meal tests, however, INS-AUC(0-120 min) was similar between P1+ and P1-, whereas early INS secretion was still different (INS-AUC(0-60 min) 3.9 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 mU.min/mL; P = 0.031). Despite higher INS-AUC(0-60 min) in P1+, early postprandial BG was comparable between groups (BG-AUC(0-60 min) 1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6 g.min/dL; difference not significant). Multiple regression analyses showed no impact of first-phase INS secretion on postprandial glycemia, either in P1+ or in P1-. Nevertheless, in P1-, but not in P1+, postprandial glycemia was negatively correlated with INS sensitivity (R(2) = 0.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study, correlating results of hyperglycemic glucose clamps with meal tests, shows that a preserved first-phase INS secretion has only a limited impact on postprandial glucose excursions in a group of subjects in early-stage type 2 diabetes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Lack of first-phase insulin (INS) secretion is regarded as causative for high postprandial glucose excursions in subjects with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine the impact of early INS secretion on postprandial glycemia. METHODS: Twenty subjects with type 2 diabetes (age 54 +/- 8 years, body mass index 28.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2) [mean +/- SD]) underwent a hyperglycemic glucose clamp and a meal test twice separated by a washout period of 4 weeks. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify determinants of postprandial glycemia. RESULTS: During hyperglycemic glucose clamps eight subjects showed a preserved first-phase INS secretion (P1+), whereas 12 subjects showed none (P1-). Both subject groups differed in fasting blood glucose (BG) (116 +/- 7 vs. 147 +/- 31 mg/dL, P = 0.011) and glycosylated hemoglobin (6.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 0.8, P = 0.041). Total INS secretory response during glucose clamps was higher in P1+ than P1- (INS-area under the concentration vs. time curve [AUC](0-120 min) 6.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 3.2 +/- 2.1 mU.min/mL; P = 0.006). During meal tests, however, INS-AUC(0-120 min) was similar between P1+ and P1-, whereas early INS secretion was still different (INS-AUC(0-60 min) 3.9 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 mU.min/mL; P = 0.031). Despite higher INS-AUC(0-60 min) in P1+, early postprandial BG was comparable between groups (BG-AUC(0-60 min) 1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6 g.min/dL; difference not significant). Multiple regression analyses showed no impact of first-phase INS secretion on postprandial glycemia, either in P1+ or in P1-. Nevertheless, in P1-, but not in P1+, postprandial glycemia was negatively correlated with INS sensitivity (R(2) = 0.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study, correlating results of hyperglycemic glucose clamps with meal tests, shows that a preserved first-phase INS secretion has only a limited impact on postprandial glucose excursions in a group of subjects in early-stage type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Miguel Ángel Gómez-Sámano; Daniel Cuevas-Ramos; Mariana Grajales-Gómez; Marco Escamilla-Márquez; Angelina López-Estrada; Luz Elizabeth Guillén-Pineda; Guadalupe López-Carrasco; Francisco J Gómez-Pérez Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2017-05-08