Literature DB >> 20105021

What kind of animal is the "Three Rs"?

Pru Hobson-West1.   

Abstract

Fifty years after the publication of The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique by Russell and Burch, this paper explores the contemporary role of the Three Rs. This is illustrated by reference to a recent social scientific study, which involved a total of 50 in-depth interviews with scientists who use animals and with other stakeholders in the debate. The data analysis shows how the Three Rs are conceptualised in at least three ways: firstly, as an ethical animal, either as a shorthand for a moral imperative, or as a route to managing an ethical dilemma; secondly, as a scientific animal, internal to the scientific method; and finally, as a political animal, with some stakeholders referring to the Three Rs as a way to promote consensus in a controversial domain. Pushing the metaphor a little further, the paper concludes that the Three Rs concept has become a kind of hybrid animal. 2009 FRAME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20105021      PMCID: PMC5019342          DOI: 10.1177/026119290903702S11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  8 in total

1.  Ethical boundary-work in the animal research laboratory.

Authors:  Pru Hobson-West
Journal:  Sociology       Date:  2012-08

2.  "But It's Just a Fish": Understanding the Challenges of Applying the 3Rs in Laboratory Aquariums in the UK.

Authors:  Reuben Message; Beth Greenhough
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Experimentally approaching the ICU: monitoring outcome-based responses in the two-hit mouse model of posttraumatic sepsis.

Authors:  Susanne Drechsler; Katrin M Weixelbaumer; Heinz Redl; Martijn van Griensven; Soheyl Bahrami; Marcin F Osuchowski
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-18

4.  Expectations for methodology and translation of animal research: a survey of health care workers.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Meredith Bara; Natalie Anton; Nathan Nobis
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Cultures of care? Animals and science in Britain.

Authors:  Carrie Friese; Nathalie Nuyts; Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Making the anaesthetised animal into a boundary object: an analysis of the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection.

Authors:  Tarquin Holmes; Carrie Friese
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 1.205

7.  Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare.

Authors:  Gail F Davies; Beth J Greenhough; Pru Hobson-West; Robert G W Kirk; Ken Applebee; Laura C Bellingan; Manuel Berdoy; Henry Buller; Helen J Cassaday; Keith Davies; Daniela Diefenbacher; Tone Druglitrø; Maria Paula Escobar; Carrie Friese; Kathrin Herrmann; Amy Hinterberger; Wendy J Jarrett; Kimberley Jayne; Adam M Johnson; Elizabeth R Johnson; Timm Konold; Matthew C Leach; Sabina Leonelli; David I Lewis; Elliot J Lilley; Emma R Longridge; Carmen M McLeod; Mara Miele; Nicole C Nelson; Elisabeth H Ormandy; Helen Pallett; Lonneke Poort; Pandora Pound; Edmund Ramsden; Emma Roe; Helen Scalway; Astrid Schrader; Chris J Scotton; Cheryl L Scudamore; Jane A Smith; Lucy Whitfield; Sarah Wolfensohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice.

Authors:  Pru Hobson-West; Ashley Davies
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2017-10-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.