Literature DB >> 20104419

Pain and pain-related interference in adults with lower-limb amputation: comparison of knee-disarticulation, transtibial, and transfemoral surgical sites.

James Behr1, Janna Friedly, Ivan Molton, David Morgenroth, Mark P Jensen, Douglas G Smith.   

Abstract

Pain and pain-related interference with physical function have not been thoroughly studied in individuals who have undergone knee-disarticulation amputations. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether individuals with knee-disarticulation amputations have worse pain and pain-related interference with physical function than do individuals with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data provided by 42 adults with lower-limb amputations. These individuals consisted of 14 adults reporting knee-disarticulation amputation in one limb and best-matched cases (14 reporting transfemoral amputation and 14 reporting transtibial amputation) from a larger cross-sectional sample of 472 individuals. Participants were rigorously matched based on time since amputation, reason for amputation, age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, and pain before amputation. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Categorical outcomes were analyzed by Pearson chi-square statistic. Given the relatively small sample size and power concerns, mean differences were also described by estimated effect size (Cohen's d). Of the 42 participants, 83% were male. They ranged in age from 36 to 85 (median = 55.1, standard deviation = 11.0). Most amputations were of traumatic origin (74%), and participants were on average 12.4 years from their amputations at the time of the survey. Individuals with transtibial amputation reported significantly more prosthesis use than did individuals with knee-disarticulation amputation. Amputation levels did not significantly differ in phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, back pain, and pain-related interference with physical function. Estimates of effect size, however, indicated that participants with knee-disarticulation amputation reported less phantom limb pain, phantom limb pain-related interference with physical function, residual limb pain, residual limb pain-related interference with physical function, and back pain-related interference with physical function than did participants with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. This study demonstrated that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation used prostheses significantly less than did patients with transtibial amputation. However, no evidence was found that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation have worse outcomes in terms of pain and pain-related interference with physical function; in fact, they may have more favorable long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20104419      PMCID: PMC3071544          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.07.0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  32 in total

1.  Why knee disarticulation (through-knee-amputation) is appropriate for non ambulatory patients.

Authors:  I Siev-Ner; M Heim; M Wershavski; A Adunsky; M Azariat
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Health related quality of life in patients with dysvascular transtibial amputation.

Authors:  N Harness; M S Pinzur
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Through-the-knee amputation: an improved technique.

Authors:  Noel Nellis; Joseph M Van De Water
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Douglas G Smith; Dawn M Ehde; Lawrence R Robinsin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Knee disarticulation versus above-knee amputation.

Authors:  R F Baumgartner
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Back pain as a secondary disability in persons with lower limb amputations.

Authors:  D M Ehde; D G Smith; J M Czerniecki; K M Campbell; D M Malchow; L R Robinson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation.

Authors:  D M Ehde; J M Czerniecki; D G Smith; K M Campbell; W T Edwards; M P Jensen; L R Robinson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Long-term results of through-knee amputation with dorsal musculocutaneous flap in patients with end-stage arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Hans-Juergen Kock; Jan Friederichs; Alexander Ouchmaev; Joachim Hillmeier; Stephan Von Gumppenberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  [Disarticulation of the knee joint].

Authors:  V Havlícek; P Janícek; I Berka
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.531

10.  Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation.

Authors:  Ellen J MacKenzie; Michael J Bosse; Renan C Castillo; Douglas G Smith; Lawrence X Webb; James F Kellam; Andrew R Burgess; Marc F Swiontkowski; Roy W Sanders; Alan L Jones; Mark P McAndrew; Brendan M Patterson; Thomas G Travison; Melissa L McCarthy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Postamputation Residual Limb Pain Severity and Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam G Evans; Sara C Chaker; Gabrielle E Curran; Mauricio A Downer; Patrick E Assi; Jeremy T Joseph; Salam Al Kassis; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.558

2.  Kinetic Gait Parameters in Unilateral Lower Limb Amputations and Normal Gait in Able-Bodied: Reference Values for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Karin Schmid-Zalaudek; Theresa Fischer; Zoltán Száva; Helmut Karl Lackner; Ursula Kropiunig; Christian Bittner; Karl Höcker; Günther Winkler; Gerfried Peternell
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  How Common Are Chronic Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Pain, and Back Pain More Than 20 Years After Lower Limb Amputation for Malignant Tumors?

Authors:  Kevin Döring; Carmen Trost; Christoph Hofer; Martin Salzer; Tryphon Kelaridis; Reinhard Windhager; Gerhard M Hobusch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Cimolato; Josephus J M Driessen; Leonardo S Mattos; Elena De Momi; Matteo Laffranchi; Lorenzo De Michieli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.208

5.  Through knee amputation: technique modifications and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Frank P Albino; Rachel Seidel; Benjamin J Brown; Charles G Crone; Christopher E Attinger
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Acute femoral shortening for reconstruction of a complex lower extremity crush injury.

Authors:  Philip K Lim; Bharat Sampathi; Nathan M Moroski; John A Scolaro
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-05-23

7.  Factors affecting activities of daily living, physical balance, and prosthesis adjustment in non-traumatic lower limb amputees.

Authors:  Evren Karaali; Altuğ Duramaz; Osman Çiloğlu; Mustafa Yalın; Mehmet Atay; Furkan Çağlayan Aslantaş
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  Osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of transtibial amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia surgical technique and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Russel Haque; Shakib Al-Jawazneh; Jason Hoellwarth; Muhammad Adeel Akhtar; Karan Doshi; Yao Chang Tan; William Yenn-Ru Lu; Claudia Roberts; Munjed Al Muderis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.