Literature DB >> 20104277

Pre-birth selection of umbilical cord blood donors.

Patrizia Urciuoli1, Simona Passeri, Francesca Ceccarelli, Barbara Luchetti, Aldo Paolicchi, Simone Lapi, Francesca Nocchi, Roberta Lamanna, Mariacarla Iorio, Renato Vanacore, Alessandro Mazzoni, Fabrizio Scatena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: . The fact that only a small percentage of cord blood units (CBU) stored are actually used for transplantation contributes to raising the already high costs of their processing and cryopreservation. The identification of predictors allowing the early identification of suitable CBU would allow a reduction of costs for the collection, storage and characterisation of CBU with insufficient volume or cell numbers. In our bank we have adopted a cut-off value for using CBU of 8 x 10(8) nucleated cells and a volume >or= 60 mL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 365 banked CBU, we evaluated the correlation between neonatal/gestational parameters and laboratory data used to assess their quality.
RESULTS: Biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference were significantly and positively correlated with CBU volume (r(2)=0.12, p=0.0011 and r(2)=0.092, p=0.0063, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that both parameters can be used to identify CBU with insufficient volume (BPD: area under the curve 0.69, 95% CI=0.57-0.82, p=0.004; abdominal circumference: area under the curve 0.67, 95% CI=0.54-0.79, p<0.01). BPD and head circumference, but not abdominal circumference or femoral length, were positively correlated with white blood cell (WBC) count (r(2)=0.215, p=0.031, and r(2)=0.299, p=0.015, respectively). Abdominal circumference, but not BPD, head circumference or femoral length, was statistically significantly correlated with the number of CD34(+) cells in the CBU. Weight at birth and placental weight were positively correlated with WBC count, blood volume, CD34(+) cell count, total colony-forming units and burst-forming units.
CONCLUSION: . Pre-birth assessment of BPD might allow the selection of donors who would yield CBU of sufficient volume and WBC count and avoid the costs of collecting, transferring, storing and analysing CBU with a high probability of resulting unsuitable for transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD34+ cell count; biparietal diameter; cord blood transplantation; cord blood units; predictive factors

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20104277      PMCID: PMC2809510          DOI: 10.2450/2009.0081-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  28 in total

1.  Cord blood banking 2002: 112,010 of 7,914,773 chances.

Authors:  Paolo Rebulla
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  Placental and/or umbilical cord blood: an alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation.

Authors:  M S Cairo; J E Wagner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi's anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling.

Authors:  E Gluckman; H A Broxmeyer; A D Auerbach; H S Friedman; G W Douglas; A Devergie; H Esperou; D Thierry; G Socie; P Lehn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Bigger is better: maternal and neonatal predictors of hematopoietic potential of umbilical cord blood units.

Authors:  K K Ballen; M Wilson; J Wuu; A M Ceredona; C Hsieh; F M Stewart; M A Popovsky; P J Quesenberry
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Marrow transplantation for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  E D Thomas; R A Clift; A Fefer; F R Appelbaum; P Beatty; W I Bensinger; C D Buckner; M A Cheever; H J Deeg; K Doney
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Liver-derived fetal hematopoietic stem cells selectively and preferentially home to the fetal bone marrow.

Authors:  E D Zanjani; J L Ascensao; M Tavassoli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Current status of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  E Gluckman
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Immunological reconstitution and correlation of circulating serum inflammatory mediators/cytokines with the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease during the first 100 days following unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  A Abu-Ghosh; S Goldman; V Slone; C van de Ven; Y Suen; L Murphy; L Sender; M Cairo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Related cord blood transplants: the Eurocord experience from 78 transplants. Eurocord Transplant group.

Authors:  V Rocha; C Chastang; G Souillet; R Pasquini; E Plouvier; A Nagler; F Locatelli; U Saarinen; G Cornu; F Bernaudin; E Gluckman
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Umbilical cord blood transplantation: where do we stand?

Authors:  Raymond C Wadlow; David L Porter
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cord Blood Banking and Transplantation in China: A Ten Years Experience of a Single Public Bank.

Authors:  Jinhui Liu; Ji He; Shu Chen; Fei Qin; Fang Wang; Gang Xu; Faming Zhu; Hangjun Lv; Lixing Yan
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Knowledge about umbilical cord blood banking among Greek citizens.

Authors:  Louiza Z Karagiorgou; Maria-Nikoletta P Pantazopoulou; Nikolaos C Mainas; Apostolos I Beloukas; Anastasios G Kriebardis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Correlation of ultrasound estimated placental volume and umbilical cord blood volume in term pregnancy.

Authors:  Papinwit Pannopnut; Maethaphan Kitporntheranunt; Panwara Paritakul; Kittipong Kongsomboon
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Knowledge about umbilical cord blood donation: a survey-based study performed in Tuscany.

Authors:  Emanuele Ginori; Sara Savelli; Mariacarla Iorio; Francesca Nocchi; Barbara Luchetti; Francesca Ceccarelli; Patrizia Urciuoli; Simone Lapi; Laura Rasero; Fabrizio Scatena
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Effects of obstetric factors and storage temperatures on the yield of endothelial colony forming cells from umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  Kate E Coldwell; Stephanie J Lee; Jennifer Kean; Cheen P Khoo; Grigorios Tsaknakis; Jon Smythe; Suzanne M Watt
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.596

6.  Impact of maternal and neonatal factors on parameters of hematopoietic potential in umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  Sara Y Al-Deghaither
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Mousavi; Morteza Zarrabi; Saeid Abroun; Mona Ahmadipanah; Bahareh Abbaspanah
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2019-12-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.