Amal S Ahmed1, Ola Leheta, Soha Younes. 1. Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismaillia, Egypt. amalnoor@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently platelet concentrates (PC) are collected using different synthetic materials and different centrifugation/leucocyte-removal processes. Upon exposure to artificial surfaces and high centrifugation forces, blood cells can undergo various levels of stress-induced, cellular activation/fragmentation and release reactions which may not only influence the extent of the platelet storage lesion but may also contribute to poor clinical effectiveness of the PC and transfusion reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An array of assays, used for quality control of PC, was performed in two different groups of PC prepared from random donor plasma on days 1, 3 and 5 of storage. The group 1 PC were not leucoreduced while the group 2 PC underwent prestorage leucoreduction using a PL50E filter. As current recommendations for the evaluation of PC include the measurement of platelet activation, in this study CD62P on platelet membrane was measured. Furthermore, in vitro studies indicate that sHLA antigens may modulate immune competent cell function so, the presence of sHLA-1 in blood components is considered a marker of immunological reactivity and this, too, was measured. RESULTS: The levels of CD62P and sHLA-1 were significantly lower in leucoreduced PC than in non-leucoreduced ones. However, the overall rate of increase of sHLA-1 during storage was faster in the leucoreduced group of PC. No significant differences were detected regarding other assays of quality. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, leucoreduced PC differ from non-leucoreduced ones in terms of some specific markers such as CD62P as a marker of platelet activation and sHLA-1 as a marker of immunological reactivity. Pre-storage leucofiltration, followed by storage in currently used plastic bags is a safe procedure for PC for up to 5 days. The available leucoreduction technologies are not, however, sufficiently robust to completely abrogate transfusions reactions, and improvements are required to reach the goal of optimised yield and minimal transfusion reactions with platelet therapy.
BACKGROUND: Currently platelet concentrates (PC) are collected using different synthetic materials and different centrifugation/leucocyte-removal processes. Upon exposure to artificial surfaces and high centrifugation forces, blood cells can undergo various levels of stress-induced, cellular activation/fragmentation and release reactions which may not only influence the extent of the platelet storage lesion but may also contribute to poor clinical effectiveness of the PC and transfusion reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An array of assays, used for quality control of PC, was performed in two different groups of PC prepared from random donor plasma on days 1, 3 and 5 of storage. The group 1 PC were not leucoreduced while the group 2 PC underwent prestorage leucoreduction using a PL50E filter. As current recommendations for the evaluation of PC include the measurement of platelet activation, in this study CD62P on platelet membrane was measured. Furthermore, in vitro studies indicate that sHLA antigens may modulate immune competent cell function so, the presence of sHLA-1 in blood components is considered a marker of immunological reactivity and this, too, was measured. RESULTS: The levels of CD62P and sHLA-1 were significantly lower in leucoreduced PC than in non-leucoreduced ones. However, the overall rate of increase of sHLA-1 during storage was faster in the leucoreduced group of PC. No significant differences were detected regarding other assays of quality. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, leucoreduced PC differ from non-leucoreduced ones in terms of some specific markers such as CD62P as a marker of platelet activation and sHLA-1 as a marker of immunological reactivity. Pre-storage leucofiltration, followed by storage in currently used plastic bags is a safe procedure for PC for up to 5 days. The available leucoreduction technologies are not, however, sufficiently robust to completely abrogate transfusions reactions, and improvements are required to reach the goal of optimised yield and minimal transfusion reactions with platelet therapy.
Authors: Joyce Curvers; Elisabeth C M van Pampus; Marion A H Feijge; Eva Rombout-Sestrienkova; Peter L A Giesen; Johan W M Heemskerk Journal: Transfusion Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Eva María Plaza; María Luisa Lozano; Isabel Sánchez Guiu; José Manuel Egea; Vicente Vicente; Laura Collantes De Terán; José Rivera Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 3.443