Literature DB >> 20104236

Segregation distortion in chicken and the evolutionary consequences of female meiotic drive in birds.

E Axelsson1, A Albrechtsen, A P van, L Li, H J Megens, A L J Vereijken, R P M A Crooijmans, M A M Groenen, H Ellegren, E Willerslev, R Nielsen.   

Abstract

As all four meiotic products give rise to sperm in males, female meiosis result in a single egg in most eukaryotes. Any genetic element with the potential to influence chromosome segregation, so that it is preferentially included in the egg, should therefore gain a transmission advantage; a process termed female meiotic drive. We are aware of two chromosomal components, centromeres and telomeres, which share the potential to influence chromosome movement during meioses and make the following predictions based on the presence of female meiotic drive: (1) centromere-binding proteins should experience rapid evolution as a result of a conflict between driving centromeres and the rest of the genome; and (2) segregation patterns should be skewed near centromeres and telomeres. To test these predictions, we first analyze the molecular evolution of seven centromere-binding proteins in nine divergent bird species. We find strong evidence for positive selection in two genes, lending support to the genomic conflict hypothesis. Then, to directly test for the presence of segregation distortion, we also investigate the transmission of approximately 9000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 197 chicken families. By simulating fair Mendelian meioses, we locate chromosomal regions with statistically significant transmission ratio distortion. One region is located near the centromere on chromosome 1 and a second region is located near the telomere on the p-arm of chromosome 1. Although these observations do not provide conclusive evidence in favour of the meiotic drive/genome conflict hypothesis, they do lend support to the hypothesis that centromeres and telomeres drive during female meioses in chicken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20104236     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  16 in total

1.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sperm should evolve to make female meiosis fair.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  John H Werren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci with allelic transmission ratio distortion in F1 chicken population.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Feilong Deng; Shiyi Chen; Jinshan Ran; Jingjing Li; Lingqian Yin; Yan Wang; Huadong Yin; Qing Zhu; Yiping Liu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren; Linnéa Smeds; Reto Burri; Pall I Olason; Niclas Backström; Takeshi Kawakami; Axel Künstner; Hannu Mäkinen; Krystyna Nadachowska-Brzyska; Anna Qvarnström; Severin Uebbing; Jochen B W Wolf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Multiple sex chromosomes in the light of female meiotic drive in amniote vertebrates.

Authors:  Martina Pokorná; Marie Altmanová; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Do Gametes Woo? Evidence for Their Nonrandom Union at Fertilization.

Authors:  Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Drosophila Nnf1 paralogs are partially redundant for somatic and germ line kinetochore function.

Authors:  Ariane C Blattner; José Aguilar-Rodríguez; Marcella Kränzlin; Andreas Wagner; Christian F Lehner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  The Telomere Paradox: Stable Genome Preservation with Rapidly Evolving Proteins.

Authors:  Bastien Saint-Leandre; Mia T Levine
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Evaluating the evidence for transmission distortion in human pedigrees.

Authors:  Wynn K Meyer; Barbara Arbeithuber; Carole Ober; Thomas Ebner; Irene Tiemann-Boege; Richard R Hudson; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.