Literature DB >> 20104149

Complications after pinning of supracondylar distal humerus fractures.

Ravi K Bashyal1, Jennifer Y Chu, Perry L Schoenecker, Matthew B Dobbs, Scott J Luhmann, J Eric Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar distal humerus fractures are one of the most common skeletal injuries in children. The current treatment of choice in North America is closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. Often surgeons leave the pins exposed beneath a cast but outside the skin. Great variation exists with respect to preoperative skin preparation, and perioperative antibiotic administration. Few data exist regarding the rate of infection and other complications. The purpose of this study is to review a large series of children to evaluate the rate of infection and other complications.
METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out of all patients treated at our institution over an 11-year period. A total of 622 patients were identified that were followed for a minimum of 2 weeks after pin removal. Seventeen patients had flexion-type fractures, 294 had type II fractures, and 311 had type III fractures. Seventy-four fractures (11.9%) had preoperative nerve deficits with anterior interosseous palsies being the most common (33 fractures, 5.3%). Preoperative antibiotics were given to 163 patients (26.2%). Spray and towel draping were used in 362 patients, paint and towel draping were used in 65 patients, alcohol paint and towel draping were used in 146 patients, and a full preparation and draping were used in 13 patients. The pins were left exposed under the cast in 591 fractures (95%), and buried beneath the skin in 31 fractures (5.0%). A medial pin was placed in 311 fractures with a small incision made to aid placement in 18 of these cases.
RESULTS: The most common complication was pin migration necessitating unexpected return to the operating room for pin removal in 11 patients (1.8%). One patient developed a deep infection with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (0.2%). Five additional patients had superficial skin infections and were treated with oral antibiotics for a total infection rate of 6 of 622 patients (1.0%). One patient ultimately had a malunion and 4 others returned to the operating room for repeat reduction and pinning. Three patients developed compartment syndromes. Ulnar nerve injury was rare with only 1 postoperative ulnar nerve injury occurring in 311 patients treated with a medial pin (0.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning is effective and has a low complication rate with a very low rate of infection even when simple betadine preparation and towel draping are used. Preoperative antibiotics seem to have little effect on infection rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20104149     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b768ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  28 in total

Review 1.  Supracondylar humeral fractures in children: current concepts for management and prognosis.

Authors:  Jaime Zorrilla S de Neira; Alfonso Prada-Cañizares; Rafael Marti-Ciruelos; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Kirschner wire osteosynthesis for fractures in childhood: bury wires or not? : Results of a survey on care reality in Germany].

Authors:  D Schneidmueller; M Kertai; V Bühren; C von Rüden
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Delayed surgery in displaced paediatric supracondylar fractures: a safe approach? Results from a large UK tertiary paediatric trauma centre.

Authors:  A I W Mayne; D C Perry; C E Bruce
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-20

4.  Surgical Management of Flexion Type Supracondylar Humeral Fracture With Ulnar Nerve Injury - A Report of a Rare Case.

Authors:  Kishore Vellingiri; Meenakshi S Andra Suryanarayana; Balasaranaya Sambathkumar; Hariprasad Seenappa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  Increased incidence of distal humeral fractures and surgical treatment in 0- to 18-year-old patients treated in Finland from 1987 to 2010.

Authors:  A Salonen; O Pajulo; T Lahdes-Vasama; J Välipakka; V M Mattila
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: effect of bone-implant interface conditions on fracture stability.

Authors:  Ron Lamdan; Meir Liebergall; Amit Gefen; Naum Symanovsky; Eran Peleg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Treatment of Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Cost and Safety Comparison.

Authors:  Christopher A Makarewich; Alan K Stotts; Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; David L Rothberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Sagittal plane alignment affects the strength of pin fixation in supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  Alexander M Bitzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Christa L LiBrizzi; Chimelie Chibututu; R Jay Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Conservative versus surgical treatment of Gartland type 2 supracondylar humeral fractures: What can help us choosing?

Authors:  Carlo Iorio; Marco Crostelli; Osvaldo Mazza; Pierpaolo Rota; Vincenzo Polito; Dario Perugia
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-12-18

10.  Complications and Predictors of Need for Return to the Operating Room in the Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children.

Authors:  Matthew E Oetgen; Gudrun E Mirick; Lara Atwater; John F Lovejoy
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.