OBJECTIVE: Reducing mental health disparities among underserved populations, particularly African American elders, is an important public health priority. The authors describe the process and challenges of developing a community/academic research partnership to address these disparities. METHODS: The authors are using a Community-Based Participatory Research approach to gain access to underserved populations in need of depression treatment. The authors identify six stages: 1) Collaborating to Secure Funding; 2) Building a Communications Platform and Research Infrastructure; 3) Fostering Enduring Relationships; 4) Assessing Needs/Educating about Research Process; 5) Initiating Specific Collaborative Projects (meeting mutual needs/interests); and 6) Maintaining a Sustainable and Productive Partnership. Data from a needs assessment developed collaboratively by researchers and community agencies facilitated agreement on mutual research goals, while strengthening the partnership. RESULTS: A community/academic-based partnership with a solid research infrastructure has been established and maintained for 3 years. Using the results of a needs assessment, the working partnership prioritized and launched several projects. Through interviews and questionnaires, community partners identified best practices for researchers working in the community. Future research and interventional projects have been developed, including plans for sustainability that will eventually shift more responsibility from the academic institution to the community agencies. CONCLUSIONS: To reach underserved populations by developing and implementing models of more effective mental health treatment, it is vital to engage community agencies offering services to this population. A successful partnership requires "cultural humility," collaborative efforts, and the development of flexible protocols to accommodate diverse communities.
OBJECTIVE: Reducing mental health disparities among underserved populations, particularly African American elders, is an important public health priority. The authors describe the process and challenges of developing a community/academic research partnership to address these disparities. METHODS: The authors are using a Community-Based Participatory Research approach to gain access to underserved populations in need of depression treatment. The authors identify six stages: 1) Collaborating to Secure Funding; 2) Building a Communications Platform and Research Infrastructure; 3) Fostering Enduring Relationships; 4) Assessing Needs/Educating about Research Process; 5) Initiating Specific Collaborative Projects (meeting mutual needs/interests); and 6) Maintaining a Sustainable and Productive Partnership. Data from a needs assessment developed collaboratively by researchers and community agencies facilitated agreement on mutual research goals, while strengthening the partnership. RESULTS: A community/academic-based partnership with a solid research infrastructure has been established and maintained for 3 years. Using the results of a needs assessment, the working partnership prioritized and launched several projects. Through interviews and questionnaires, community partners identified best practices for researchers working in the community. Future research and interventional projects have been developed, including plans for sustainability that will eventually shift more responsibility from the academic institution to the community agencies. CONCLUSIONS: To reach underserved populations by developing and implementing models of more effective mental health treatment, it is vital to engage community agencies offering services to this population. A successful partnership requires "cultural humility," collaborative efforts, and the development of flexible protocols to accommodate diverse communities.
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Thomas R Ten Have; Charles F Reynolds; Ira I Katz; Herbert C Schulberg; Benoit H Mulsant; Gregory K Brown; Gail J McAvay; Jane L Pearson; George S Alexopoulos Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rayan K Al Jurdi; Herbert C Schulberg; Rebecca L Greenberg; Mark E Kunik; Ariel Gildengers; Martha Sajatovic; Benoit H Mulsant; Robert C Young Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Deborah Dobransky-Fasiska; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Harold Alan Pincus; Enrico Castillo; Brenda E Lee; Adrienne L Walnoha; Charles F Reynolds; Charlotte Brown Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Michelle C Kegler; Daniel S Blumenthal; Tabia Henry Akintobi; Kirsten Rodgers; Katherine Erwin; Winifred Thompson; Ernest Hopkins Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2016
Authors: Manka Nkimbeng; Hae-Ra Han; Sarah L Szanton; Kamila A Alexander; Melissa Davey-Rothwell; Jarod T Giger; Laura N Gitlin; Jin Hui Joo; Sokha Koeuth; Katherine A Marx; Chivon A Mingo; Laura J Samuel; Janiece L Taylor; Jennifer Wenzel; Jeanine M Parisi Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2022-09-07
Authors: Deborah Juarbe-Rey; Adriana Obén Pérez; Roberto Papo Christian P Santoni; Melissa Ramírez Ramírez; Mildred Vera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ida Griesemer; Brooke S Staley; Alexandra F Lightfoot; Lizzy Bain; Derrick Byrd; Carol Conway; Tracey L Grant; Barbara Leach; Laura Milko; Lonna Mollison; Nadiah Porter; Sharron Reid; Gerri Smith; Margaret Waltz; Jonathan S Berg; Christine Rini; Julianne M O'Daniel Journal: Per Med Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 2.512