Literature DB >> 20103989

Enhancement of cytoplasmic maturation of in vitro-matured pig oocytes by mechanical vibration.

Yamato Mizobe1, Mitsutoshi Yoshida, Kazuchika Miyoshi.   

Abstract

The effects of mechanical vibration during in vitro maturation and/or in vitro culture after artificial activation of pig oocytes on maturation and development were examined. In addition, the optimal conditions were applied to in vitro production of blastocysts derived from miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos. Mechanical vibration during in vitro maturation did not affect the rates (60.5 +/- 1.9-69.5 +/- 2.2%) of oocytes reaching the metaphase-II stage. However, the blastocyst formation rates after activation of oocytes matured with mechanical vibration for 5 sec at intervals of 30-60 min or for 10 sec at intervals of 60 min were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those of oocytes matured without mechanical vibration (25.7 +/- 2.0-28.1 +/- 2.7% vs. 12.3 +/- 1.4% and 25.8 +/- 1.8% vs. 15.7 +/- 1.9%, respectively). In contrast, mechanical vibration during in vitro culture after activation did not affect the blastocyst formation (11.6 +/- 5.2-16.5 +/- 3.0%) of oocytes. Mechanical vibration for 5 sec at intervals of 60 min during in vitro maturation of oocytes did not affect fusion (66.8 +/- 3.5-72.1 +/- 3.1%) with miniature pig somatic cells after enucleation. However, the blastocyst formation rate of SCNT embryos was improved (P<0.05) by mechanically vibrating recipient oocytes for 5 sec at intervals of 60 min during in vitro maturation, regardless of the presence or absence of the same treatment during in vitro culture (17.6 +/- 2.5% vs. 9.4 +/- 0.9% and 13.0 +/- 0.3% vs. 7.4 +/- 0.9%, respectively). The results indicated that mechanical vibration enhances the cytoplasmic maturation of in vitro-matured pig oocytes, resulting in improvement of their parthenogenetic development. In addition, it was shown that in vitro maturation of oocytes with mechanical vibration can be applied to efficient production of blastocysts derived from miniature pig SCNT embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20103989     DOI: 10.1262/jrd.09-142a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Dev        ISSN: 0916-8818            Impact factor:   2.214


  11 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: new developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama; Jason E Swain
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Effect of micro-vibration culture system on embryo development.

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Jeong Hyun Park; Eun Kyung Ryu; Sung Jin Park; Jun Ho Lee; Soo Hee Lee; Jung Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  In Vitro Microvibration Increases Implantation Rate After Embryonic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Vladimir Isachenko; Karl Sterzik; Robert Maettner; Evgenia Isachenko; Plamen Todorov; Gohar Rahimi; Peter Mallmann; Erwin Strehler; Igor Pereligin; José Luis Alabart; Markus Merzenich
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Microfluidic analysis of oocyte and embryo biomechanical properties to improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Livia Z Yanez; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Microwells support high-resolution time-lapse imaging and development of preimplanted mouse embryos.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Chung; Yi-Hsing Hsiao; Wei-Lun Kao; Chia-Hsien Hsu; Da-Jeng Yao; Chihchen Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Integrated multiple transcriptomes in oviductal tissue across the porcine estrous cycle reveal functional roles in oocyte maturation and transport.

Authors:  Min-Jae Jang; Chiwoong Lim; Byeonghwi Lim; Jun-Mo Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  "Naturalization" of Routine Assisted Reproductive Technologies by In Vitro Culture of Embryos with Microvibration: Sex Ratio, Body Length, and Weight of 2,456 Live-Birth Deliveries after Transfer of 9,624 Embryos In Vitro Cultured in Static System and with Microvibration.

Authors:  Vladimir Isachenko; Karl Sterzik; Evgenia Isachenko; Robert Maettner; Plamen Todorov; Gohar Rahimi; Peter Mallmann; Erwin Strehler; Igor Pereligin; José Luis Alabart; Markus Merzenich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of static culture, micro-vibration culture, and micro-vibration culture with co-culture in poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Eun Kyung Ryu; San Hyun Yoon; Kyung Sil Lim; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Efficacy of mechanical micro-vibration in the development of bovine embryos during in vitro maturation and culture.

Authors:  Masahiro Takahashi; Tatsutoshi Honda; Shingo Hatoya; Toshio Inaba; Noritoshi Kawate; Hiromichi Tamada
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  In vivo dynamic 3D imaging of oocytes and embryos in the mouse oviduct.

Authors:  Shang Wang; Irina V Larina
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.