Literature DB >> 20102893

Meta-analysis of comparative efficacy of increasing dose of Atorvastatin versus Rosuvastatin versus Simvastatin on lowering levels of atherogenic lipids (from VOYAGER).

Stephen J Nicholls1, Gunnar Brandrup-Wognsen, Mike Palmer, Philip J Barter.   

Abstract

Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Although dose-dependent reductions in levels of atherogenic lipids are observed with all statins, the impact of increasing dose has not been fully elucidated. An individual patient data pooled analysis was performed of 32,258 patients in studies comparing the efficacy of rosuvastatin with that of atorvastatin or simvastatin. The impact of increasing dose on lowering LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B was investigated. Doubling the dose of each statin was accompanied by a 4% to 7% greater degree of lowering of all atherogenic lipids. A stronger correlation was observed between changes in LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (r = 0.92, p <0.001) or apolipoprotein B (r = 0.76, p <0.001) than triglycerides (r = 0.14, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, baseline lipid level (p <0.0001) and increasing statin dose (p <0.0001) were strong predictors of achieving treatment goals in high-risk patients. Increasing age was a strong independent predictor of achieving goal for all atherogenic lipids (p <0.0001). Achieving LDL cholesterol goals was also more likely in women (p <0.0001), patients with diabetes (p <0.0001), and patients without atherosclerotic disease (p = 0.0002). In contrast, normal triglyceride levels were more often observed in men (p <0.0001) and patients without diabetes mellitus (p = 0.03). In conclusion, doubling statin dose was associated with greater lowering of LDL cholesterol by 4% to 6% and non-HDL cholesterol by 3% to 6%. Greater lipid goal achievement with increasing dose supports the use of high-dose statin therapy for more effective cardiovascular prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20102893     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  44 in total

1.  Is bigger better? An argument for very low starting doses.

Authors:  James P McCormack; G Michael Allan; Adil S Virani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Statin-ezetimibe versus statin lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Yun-Yan Dai; Hai-Shan Zhang; Xin-Gang Zhang; Qi-Gang Guan; Yuan Gao; Yu-Ze Li; Yue-Lan Zhang; Da-Lin Jia; Ying-Xian Sun; Guo-Xian Qi; Wen Tian
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Simvastatin represses protein synthesis in the muscle-derived C₂C₁₂ cell line with a concomitant reduction in eukaryotic initiation factor 2B expression.

Authors:  Alexander P Tuckow; Sarah J Jefferson; Scot R Kimball; Leonard S Jefferson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Alirocumab as Add-On to Atorvastatin Versus Other Lipid Treatment Strategies: ODYSSEY OPTIONS I Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Harold Bays; Daniel Gaudet; Robert Weiss; Juan Lima Ruiz; Gerald F Watts; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Jennifer Robinson; Jian Zhao; Corinne Hanotin; Stephen Donahue
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Effects of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on small dense low-density lipoprotein: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Masao Niwa; Yusuke Mizuno; Hirotaka Yamamoto; Shin-nosuke Goto; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5: natural history, biomarkers and a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ludger Schöls; Tim W Rattay; Peter Martus; Christoph Meisner; Jonathan Baets; Imma Fischer; Christine Jägle; Matthew J Fraidakis; Andrea Martinuzzi; Jonas Alex Saute; Marina Scarlato; Antonella Antenora; Claudia Stendel; Philip Höflinger; Charles Marques Lourenco; Lisa Abreu; Katrien Smets; Martin Paucar; Tine Deconinck; Dana M Bis; Sarah Wiethoff; Peter Bauer; Alessia Arnoldi; Wilson Marques; Laura Bannach Jardim; Stefan Hauser; Chiara Criscuolo; Alessandro Filla; Stephan Züchner; Maria Teresa Bassi; Thomas Klopstock; Peter De Jonghe; Ingemar Björkhem; Rebecca Schüle
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Merran Macpherson; Bengt Hamrén; Marjet J A M Braamskamp; John J P Kastelein; Torbjörn Lundström; Paul D Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rosuvastatin in patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis.

Authors:  Bruce K Birmingham; Suzanne K Swan; Tom Puchalski; Pat Mitchell; Connie Azumaya; Julie Zalikowski; Yi Wang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  LDL cholesterol goals in high-risk patients: how low do we go and how do we get there?

Authors:  Joost Besseling; Julian van Capelleveen; John J P Kastelein; G Kees Hovingh
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Approach to Statin Use in 2016: an Update.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.