Literature DB >> 20102878

Quantitative impact of cardiovascular risk factors and vascular closure devices on the femoral artery after repeat cardiac catheterization.

Klaus A Tiroch1, Michael E Matheny, Frederic S Resnic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the exact quantitative long-term impact of repeated catheterizations, vascular closure devices, and cardiovascular risk factors on the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization.
METHODS: A total of 2,102 available femoral angiograms from 827 consecutive patients were analyzed using caliper-based quantitative vascular analysis. These patients underwent coronary interventions between January 2005 and April 2007 and had at least one additional catheterization procedure through the ipsilateral femoral access site from December 2001 until January 2008. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding variables. The primary outcome was change in artery size.
RESULTS: The average punctured artery diameter was 6.5 +/- 2.1 mm. The average time between the first case and last follow-up was 349 days. There was no significant change of the punctured artery size over time after the index procedure (P = .15) and no change associated with the use of vascular closure devices (P = .25) after multivariate analysis. Smaller arteries were associated with female gender (-1.22 mm, P < .0001), presence of angiographic peripheral vascular disease (PVD, -1.19 mm, P < .0001), and current (-0.48 mm, P = .001) or former (-0.23 mm, P = .01) smoking status, whereas previous statin therapy was associated with an increase in artery size (+0.47 mm, P < .0001). Vascular closure devices were used less often compared with manual compression in cases preceding the first detection of angiographic PVD (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Vascular closure devices are not associated with a change in the artery size or progression of PVD. Overall, there is no change in vessel size over time after repeat catheterizations, with a decrease in vessel size associated with current and former smoking and an increase with previous statin therapy. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20102878      PMCID: PMC2818977          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  17 in total

1.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository.

Authors:  R G Brindis; S Fitzgerald; H V Anderson; R E Shaw; W S Weintraub; J F Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Critical lessons from the ENHANCE trial.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Donald Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Relationships among patient characteristics, comorbidities, and vascular complications post-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Julie Sabo; Linda L Chlan; Kay Savik
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions.

Authors:  Hans Rickli; Martin Unterweger; Gabor Sütsch; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Markus Sagmeister; Peter Ammann; Franz W Amann
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices.

Authors:  G Dangas; R Mehran; S Kokolis; D Feldman; L F Satler; A D Pichard; K M Kent; A J Lansky; G W Stone; M B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Common femoral artery anatomy is influenced by demographics and comorbidity: implications for cardiac and peripheral invasive studies.

Authors:  G Schnyder; N Sawhney; B Whisenant; S Tsimikas; Z G Turi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices.

Authors:  D C Duffin; J B Muhlestein; S B Allisson; B D Horne; R E Fowles; S G Sorensen; J R Revenaugh; T L Bair; D L Lappe
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 8.  Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Koreny; Eva Riedmüller; Mariam Nikfardjam; Peter Siostrzonek; Marcus Müllner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.

Authors:  Jack L Martin; Antonis Pratsos; Edward Magargee; Kim Mayhew; Catherine Pensyl; Mary Nunn; Francis Day; Timothy Shapiro
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Risk predictors of retroperitoneal hemorrhage following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Klaus A Tiroch; Nipun Arora; Michael E Matheny; Christopher Liu; Timothy C Lee; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vascular closure device failure in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Venkatesan D Vidi; Michael E Matheny; Usha S Govindarajulu; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Susan L Robbins; Vikram V Agarwal; Sripal Bangalore; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.195

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.