Literature DB >> 20102855

Efficacy of a meal-replacement program for promoting blood lipid changes and weight and body fat loss in US Army soldiers.

Tracey J Smith1, Lori D Sigrist, Gaston P Bathalon, Susan McGraw, J Philip Karl, Andrew J Young.   

Abstract

Excess weight is associated with negative health outcomes. Meal replacements are effective in promoting favorable body composition changes in civilian populations; however, their efficacy with military service members who have unique lifestyles is unknown. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the efficacy of the Army's education-based weight-management program, "Weigh to Stay," with and without meal replacements for improving blood lipids, and to promote weight and body fat loss in overweight US Army soldiers. Soldiers (n=113; 76 males/37 females) attending Weigh to Stay at Fort Bragg, NC, in 2006/2007 were randomized to Weigh to Stay only or a commercially available meal-replacement program (two meal replacements per day) in conjunction with Weigh to Stay, and followed until Army body fat standards were met or for 6 months if standards were not met. Study completers (n=46) in both treatment groups lost weight (Weigh to Stay: -2.7+/-4.3 kg; meal replacers: -3.8+/-3.5 kg) and fat mass (Weigh to Stay, -2.7+/-3.2 kg; meal replacers: -2.9+/-2.5 kg), and improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (Weigh to Stay: 13+/-9 mg/dL [0.34+/-0.23 mmol/L]; meal replacers: 8+/-7 mg/dL [0.21+/-0.18 mmol/L]; P<0.05); however, no between-group differences were observed. Attrition was lower (P=0.009) and success in meeting body fat standards tended to be higher (P=0.06) for the meal replacers vs Weigh to Stay participants. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that meal replacers lost more weight (1.2+/-0.5 kg), percent body fat (1.0%+/-0.4%), and fat mass (0.8+/-0.4 kg) compared to Weigh to Stay volunteers (P<0.05). Our findings suggest that meal replacement use can be recommended as a potential adjunct strategy to Weigh to Stay. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20102855     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of a pilot Internet-based weight management program (H.E.A.L.T.H.) and longitudinal physical fitness data in Army Reserve soldiers.

Authors:  Robert L Newton; Hongmei Han; Tiffany M Stewart; Donna H Ryan; Donald A Williamson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Comparative effectiveness of a low-calorie diet combined with acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy, meal replacements, or exercise for obesity over different intervention periods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seo-Young Kim; In-Soo Shin; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Dietary, physical activity, and weight management interventions among active-duty military personnel: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Malkawi; Ree M Meertens; Stef P J Kremers; Ester F C Sleddens
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-12-24

4.  Effect of Two Meal Replacement strategies on Cardiovascular Risk Parameters in Advanced Age Patients with Obesity and Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Juan José López-Gómez; Olatz Izaola-Jauregui; David Primo-Martín; Beatriz Torres-Torres; Emilia Gómez-Hoyos; Ana Ortolá-Buigues; Miguel A Martín-Ferrero; Daniel A De Luis-Román
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.