Literature DB >> 20102658

Effect of ground cover vegetation on the abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards.

E B Silva1, J C Franco, T Vasconcelos, M Branco.   

Abstract

The effect of ground cover upon the communities of beneficial arthropods established in the canopy of lemon trees was investigated, by comparing three ground-cover management treatments applied: RV, resident vegetation; S, sowed selected species; and BS, bare soil by controlling weeds with herbicide. Over two consecutive years, arthropod communities in the tree canopy were sampled periodically by beating and suction techniques. Significantly higher numbers of beneficial arthropods were found in the RV and S treatments in comparison with bare soil. Spiders and parasitoid wasps were the two most common groups, representing, respectively, 70% and 19% of all catches in beating samples and 33% and 53% in suction samples. For the RV and S treatments, significant seasonal deviations from the bare soil treatment were observed using principal response curves. Similar seasonal patterns were observed over the two years. The RV and S treatments showed significant positive deviations from the BS treatment in late spring and summer, accounted for the higher numbers of parasitoid wasps, coccinelids and lacewings present. By contrast, the seasonal deviations observed for the spider community differed from those of the remaining arthropods. During late winter and early spring, the RV and S treatments presented a higher abundance of spiders in the tree canopy, in comparison with bare soil, whereas in the summer significantly more spiders were found in the bare soil treatment. Spider movements between tree canopy and ground vegetation layers may justify this result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20102658     DOI: 10.1017/S0007485309990526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  6 in total

1.  Seasonal abundance of soil arthropods in relation to meteorological and edaphic factors in the agroecosystems of Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Mussadiq Shakir; Sohail Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Effect of a cover crop on the aphid incidence is not explained by increased top-down regulation.

Authors:  Jeniffer K Alvarez-Baca; Xiomara Montealegre; Cécile Le Lann; Joan Van Baaren; Blas Lavandero
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Is ground cover vegetation an effective biological control enhancement strategy against olive pests?

Authors:  Daniel Paredes; Luis Cayuela; Geoff M Gurr; Mercedes Campos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neonicotinoid contamination in wildflowers collected from citrus orchards in a northwestern Mediterranean Region (Spain) after tree foliar treatments.

Authors:  Ana Isabel García-Valcárcel; José Miguel Campos-Rivela; María Dolores Hernando Guil; María Teresa Martínez-Ferrer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Testing the enemies hypothesis in peach orchards in two different geographic areas in eastern China: the role of ground cover vegetation.

Authors:  Nian-Feng Wan; Xiang-Yun Ji; Jie-Xian Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Impacts of Wildflower Interventions on Beneficial Insects in Fruit Crops: A Review.

Authors:  Michelle T Fountain
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.