Literature DB >> 20101174

Early cholecystectomy safely decreases hospital stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: a randomized prospective study.

Armen Aboulian1, Tony Chan, Arezou Yaghoubian, Amy H Kaji, Brant Putnam, Angela Neville, Bruce E Stabile, Christian de Virgilio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours of admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis, regardless of resolution of abdominal pain or abnormal laboratory values, would result in a shorter hospital stay. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although there is consensus among surgeons that patients with gallstone pancreatitis should undergo cholecystectomy to prevent recurrence, the precise timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild disease remains controversial.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with mild pancreatitis (Ranson score <or=3) were prospectively randomized to either an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (within 48 hours of admission) versus a control laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (performed after resolution of abdominal pain and normalizing trend of laboratory enzymes). The primary end point was hospital length of stay. Secondary end point was a composite of rates of conversion to an open procedure, perioperative complications, and need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. The study was designed to enroll 100 patients with an interim analysis after 50 patients.
RESULTS: At interim analysis, 50 patients were enrolled at a single university-affiliated public hospital. Of them, 25 patients were randomized to the early group and 25 patients to the control group. Patient age ranged from 18 to 74 years with a median duration of symptoms of 2 days upon presentation and a median Ranson score of 1. There were no baseline differences between the groups with regards to demographics, clinical presentation, or the presence of comorbidities. The hospital length of stay was shorter for the early cholecystectomy group (mean: 3.5 [95% CI, 2.7-4.3], median: 3 [IQR, 2-4]) compared with the control group (mean: 5.8 [95% CI, 3.8-7.9], median: 4 [IQR, 4-6] [P = 0.0016]). Six patients from the early group required endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, compared with 4 in the control group (P = 0.72). There was no statistically significant difference in the need for conversion to an open procedure or in perioperative complication rates between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: In mild gallstone pancreatitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours of admission, regardless of the resolution of abdominal pain or laboratory abnormalities, results in a shorter hospital length of stay with no apparent impact on the technical difficulty of the procedure or perioperative complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101174     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c38f1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Amanda Johner; Adam Raymakers; Sam M Wiseman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Early Stage.

Authors:  Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Sorin Traian Barbu; Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu Vasiliu; Radu Costea; Stefan Neagu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

4.  Timing of cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis treatment.

Authors:  Uygar Demir; Pınar Yazıcı; Özgür Bostancı; Cemal Kaya; Hakan Köksal; Gürhan Işıl; Emre Bozdağ; Mehmet Mihmanlı
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03-01

5.  Association of Early vs Delayed Cholecystectomy for Mild Gallstone Pancreatitis With Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Emily D Dubina; Christian de Virgilio; Eric R Simms; Dennis Y Kim; Ashkan Moazzez
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis: how early is safe?

Authors:  Pablo Giuffrida; David Biagiola; Agustín Cristiano; Victoria Ardiles; Martín de Santibañes; Rodrigo Sanchez Clariá; Juan Pekolj; Eduardo de Santibañes; Oscar Mazza
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-03

7.  ERCP or NO ERCP: the case report of a frail patient.

Authors:  Vincenzo Occhipinti; Simone Segato; Alberto Carrara; Stefania Orlando; Dario Conte
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis with Mild Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Hai-Feng Yu; Tong Guo; Peng Xie; Zhi-Wei Zhang; Ya-Hong Yu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  Etiology and outcome of acute pancreatitis in children in Kashmir (India). An endemic area of hepatobiliary ascariasis.

Authors:  Gul Javid; Showkat Zargar; Altaf Shah; Abid Shoukat; Asif Iqball; Amit Gupta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.