Literature DB >> 20100964

Pharmacogenomic and pharmacoproteomic studies of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analysis of a phase I dose-escalation study.

Josep Tabernero1, Andres Cervantes, Fernando Rivera, Erika Martinelli, Federico Rojo, Anja von Heydebreck, Teresa Macarulla, Edith Rodriguez-Braun, Maria Eugenia Vega-Villegas, Stefanie Senger, Francisco Javier Ramos, Susana Roselló, Ilhan Celik, Christopher Stroh, José Baselga, Fortunato Ciardiello.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed biomarkers for cetuximab efficacy in tissue samples collected during a phase I dose-escalation study exploring every second week administration of cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients received cetuximab monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by cetuximab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan until disease progression. Patients in the control arm received cetuximab as a 400 mg/m(2) initial dose then 250 mg/m(2) per week; patients in the dose-escalation arms received 400 to 700 mg/m(2) every second week. Tumor and skin biopsies were taken for immunohistochemical and microarray expression analyses (tumor only) at baseline and week 4. Plasma was collected for proteomic analysis at baseline and week 4. KRAS tumor mutation status was assessed.
RESULTS: In subsets of paired skin samples from 35 patients, cetuximab treatment was associated with substantial downregulation of phospho(p)-EGFR, p-MAPK and proliferation and substantial upregulation of p27(Kip1) and p-STAT3 levels. No marked difference in these effects was noted for different schedules of administration and dose levels. In the cetuximab monotherapy phase, responses were seen only in patients whose tumors were wild-type for KRAS (eight of 29 v zero of 19 for KRAS mutant tumors; P = .015). Progression-free survival was longer for patients with KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutant tumors (log-rank P = .048). Genomics/proteomics analyses (42 and 45 patients, respectively) identified candidate biomarkers associated with response.
CONCLUSION: Biomarker analysis supported the functional equivalence of weekly and every second week administration of cetuximab and provided further confirmation that patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC were those most likely to benefit from cetuximab treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100964     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  HGF rescues colorectal cancer cells from EGFR inhibition via MET activation.

Authors:  David Liska; Chin-Tung Chen; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; James G Christensen; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Uptake of KRAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe, Latin America and Asia.

Authors:  Fortunato Ciardiello; Sabine Tejpar; Nicola Normanno; Domenica Mercadante; Tracey Teague; Bruno Wohlschlegel; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  A pilot study of volume measurement as a method of tumor response evaluation to aid biomarker development.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Chaya S Moskowitz; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Pingzhen Guo; Valerie M Rusch; Marc Ladanyi; Naiyer A Rizvi; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Randy F Sweis; Michael W Drazer; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Early skin toxicity predicts better outcomes, and early tumor shrinkage predicts better response after cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Kogawa; A Doi; M Shimokawa; T M Fouad; T Osuga; F Tamura; T Mizushima; T Kimura; S Abe; H Ihara; T Kukitsu; T Sumiyoshi; N Yoshizaki; M Hirayama; T Sasaki; Y Kawarada; S Kitashiro; S Okushiba; H Kondo; Y Tsuji
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Cost estimates and economic implications of expanded RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sheetal M Kircher; Nisha Mohindra; Halla Nimeiri
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-11-19

7.  Targeted therapies: Cetuximab dosing by rash--is the scaling of EVEREST meaningful?

Authors:  Sebastian Stintzing; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Biweekly cetuximab plus FOLFIRI/irinotecan as first/second-line chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in Southwest Chinese population.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Dan Cao; Feng Bi; Qiu Li; Meng Qiu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  STAT3 expression, molecular features, inflammation patterns, and prognosis in a database of 724 colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Yoshifumi Baba; Mai Yamauchi; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Kaori Shima; Noriko Tanaka; Curtis Huttenhower; David A Frank; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Luo; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.